ArticleForum for health economics & policy2011
Personality Measurement and Assessment in Large Panel Surveys*
Article in Forum for health economics & policy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic variance in conscientiousness relates to youth psychopathology beyond executive functions.Journal of psychopathology and clinical science · 2022Article
- Personality Traits and Further Training.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- The Health and Retirement Study: Analysis of Associations Between Use of the Internet for Health Information and Use of Health Services at Multiple Time Points.Journal of medical Internet research · 2018Article
- Can personality traits and intelligence compensate for background disadvantage? Predicting status attainment in adulthood.Journal of personality and social psychology · 2015Article
- Cognitive ability and personality as predictors of participation in a national colorectal cancer screening programme: the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2015Article
- Measurement Matters: Assessing Personal Qualities Other Than Cognitive Ability for Educational Purposes.Educational researcher (Washington, D.C. : 1972) · 2015Article
- The conscientious retiree: The relationship between conscientiousness, retirement, and volunteering.Journal of research in personality · 2014Article
- Conscientiousness: origins in childhood?Developmental psychology · 2014Review
- Who does well in life? Conscientious adults excel in both objective and subjective success.Frontiers in psychology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Personality tests are being added to large panel studies with increasing regularity, such as the Health and Retirement Study (HRS). To facilitate the inclusion and interpretation of these tests, we provide some general background on personality psychology, personality assessment, and the validity of personality tests. In this review, we provide background on definitions of personality, the strengths and weaknesses of the self-report approaches to personality testing typically used in large panel studies, and the validity of personality tests for three outcomes: genetics, income, and health. We conclude with recommendations on how to improve personality assessment in future panel studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.