ArticleJornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia
Applicability of the London Chest Activity of Daily Living scale in patients on the waiting list for lung transplantation.
Article in Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Physical Exercise on Walking Distance and Functional Limitations in Patients with Chronic Dyspnea.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Association between Experimental Pain Measurements and the Central Sensitization Inventory in Patients at Least 3 Months after COVID-19 Infection: A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Efficacy of Acupuncture on Quality of Life, Functional Performance, Dyspnea, and Pulmonary Function in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- The immediate post-operative period following lung transplantation: mapping of nursing interventions.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the applicability of the London Chest Activity of Daily Living (LCADL) scale in patients on the waiting list for lung transplantation.
methodsThis was a cross-sectional study, conducted between May and September of 2010, involving 26 male and female patients on the waiting list for lung transplantation and treated at the Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program in the Complexo Hospitalar Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre, located in the city of Porto Alegre, Brazil. We evaluated the patients using the six-minute walk test (6MWT) and pulmonary function tests. We also obtained the LCADL scores, as well as the modified Borg scale scores for sensation of dyspnea and leg fatigue. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used to determine the internal consistency of the LCADL scale. Linear regression analysis was used in order to identify associations between the total LCADL score (expressed as a percentage) and the variables studied.
resultsAccording to the LCADL scale results, 69% of the patients reported that the performance of their activities of daily living was significantly impaired by their dyspnea. The internal consistency of the LCADL scale was 0.89. After adjusting for age and FEV1, we found that the total LCADL scale score showed statistically significant negative associations with the six-minute walk distance (β = -0.087; p < 0.001) and the six-minute walk work (β = -0.285; p < 0.001).
conclusionsOur findings suggest that the LCADL scale is a useful tool for assessing patients on the waiting list for lung transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.