Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23503463›Full record

ReviewOncogene2014

Context-specific regulation of cancer epigenomes by histone and transcription factor methylation.

M Sarris, K Nikolaou, I Talianidis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Oncogene, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mechanism of gene-specificity of oncogenic regulators.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2016
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M SarrisBiomedical Sciences Research Center Alexander Fleming, Vari, Greece.
K NikolaouBiomedical Sciences Research Center Alexander Fleming, Vari, Greece.
I TalianidisBiomedical Sciences Research Center Alexander Fleming, Vari, Greece.
Alexander Fleming Biomedical Sciences Research Center · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Altered expression or activity of histone lysine methylases and demethylases in cancer lead to aberrant chromatin modification patterns, which contribute to uncontrolled cell proliferation via cancer-specific deregulation of gene expression programs or the induction of genome instability. Several transcription factors that regulate growth-associated genes undergo lysine methylation, expanding the repertoire of regulatory targets modulated by histone-methylating enzymes during tumorigenesis. In certain specific tumor types or specific physiological conditions, these enzymes may trigger chromatin structure and/or transcription factor activity changes that result in opposite effects on cancer initiation or progression. The mechanisms of such context-specific dual functions and those involved in the crosstalk between factor and histone modifications are subject to extensive research, which is beginning to shed light into this novel level of complexity of cancer-related epigenetic pathways.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalChromatinHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseHistonesHumansMethylationNeoplasmsTranscription FactorsChromatinHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseHistonesTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID23503463
OpenAlexW2017152304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.