Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23503324›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2013

Advantages of enteral nutrition over parenteral nutrition.

David S Seres, Monika Valcarcel, Alexandra Guillaume

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06717321 (Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Versus Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy With Jejunal Extension), which is not on this map. Cited by 50 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06717321 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Versus Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy With Jejunal Extension: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorJerry DangRan2025 to 2025Enrolled2ConditionsAspiration Pneumonias, Tube Feeding, Enteral FeedsArms(Arm 1): PEG, (Arm 2): PEG-J
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 156 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Updates in Intestinal Failure Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Fat malabsorption in short bowel syndrome: A review of pathophysiology and management.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David S SeresAssociate Professor of Clinical Medicine, Director, Medical Nutrition and Nutrition Support Service, Division of Preventive Medicine and Nutrition, Columbia University Medical Center P&S 9-501, 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Monika Valcarcel
Alexandra Guillaume
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USColumbia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is a strong and commonly held belief among nutrition clinicians that enteral nutrition is preferable to parenteral nutrition. We provide a narrative review of more recent studies and technical reviews comparing enteral nutrition with parenteral nutrition. Despite significant weaknesses in the existing data, current literature continues to support the use of enteral nutrition in patients requiring nutrition support, over parenteral nutrition.

Indexed as

complicationsenteral nutritionpancreatitisparenteral nutritionsurgery

Identifiers

PMID23503324
PMCPMC3589130
OpenAlexW2033249376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.