Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23502430›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2013

Identification of prognostic gene signatures of glioblastoma: a study based on TCGA data analysis.

Yong-Wan Kim, Dimpy Koul, Se Hoon Kim, Agda Karina Lucio-Eterovic, Pablo R Freire, Jun Yao, Jing Wang, Jonas S Almeida, Ken Aldape, W K Alfred Yung

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Letter to the editor "Identification of MSC-AS1, a novel lncRNA for the diagnosis of laryngeal cancer".European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yong-Wan KimCancer Research Institute of Medical Science, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Dimpy Koul
Se Hoon Kim
Agda Karina Lucio-Eterovic
Pablo R Freire
Jun Yao
Jing Wang
Jonas S Almeida
Ken Aldape
W K Alfred Yung
Catholic University of Korea · KRCancer Research Institute · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Tropism Enhanced Oncolytic Adenovirus for the Treatment of Brain TumorsP50CA127001 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Juan Fueyo · 2008 to 2026
$41.2M
Deciphering synergistic combinatorial targets in gliomaR01CA123304 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI YUNG, W K ALFRED · 2006 to 2010
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS CA 123304NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P30 CA 127001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project is a large-scale effort with the goal of identifying novel molecular aberrations in glioblastoma (GBM).

methodsHere, we describe an in-depth analysis of gene expression data and copy number aberration (CNA) data to classify GBMs into prognostic groups to determine correlates of subtypes that may be biologically significant.

resultsTo identify predictive survival models, we searched TCGA in 173 patients and identified 42 probe sets (P = .0005) that could be used to divide the tumor samples into 3 groups and showed a significantly (P = .0006) improved overall survival. Kaplan-Meier plots showed that the median survival of group 3 was markedly longer (127 weeks) than that of groups 1 and 2 (47 and 52 weeks, respectively). We then validated the 42 probe sets to stratify the patients according to survival in other public GBM gene expression datasets (eg, GSE4290 dataset). An overall analysis of the gene expression and copy number aberration using a multivariate Cox regression model showed that the 42 probe sets had a significant (P < .018) prognostic value independent of other variables.

conclusionsBy integrating multidimensional genomic data from TCGA, we identified a specific survival model in a new prognostic group of GBM and suggest that molecular stratification of patients with GBM into homogeneous subgroups may provide opportunities for the development of new treatment modalities.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticDNA Copy Number VariationsEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Regulatory NetworksGenomicsGlioblastomaHumansModels, StatisticalOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorRNA, Messengercomparative genomic hybridizationEMTgene expressionglioblastomaprognostic markerTCGA

Identifiers

PMID23502430
PMCPMC3688008
OpenAlexW2129921538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.