Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23500202›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of pharmacology2013

The application of conditioning paradigms in the measurement of pain.

Jun-Xu Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Calf aversion to hot-iron disbudding.Scientific reports · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jun-Xu LiDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, 102 Farber Hall, 3435 Main Street, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA. Electronic address: junxuli@buffalo.edu.

Funding

IMIDAZOLINE I2 RECEPTORS AS TARGETS FOR THE TREATMENT OF PAINR01DA034806 · NIDA · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI LI, JUN-XU · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA034806NIDA NIH HHS R01DA034806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pain is a private experience that involves both sensory and emotional components. Animal studies of pain can only be inferred by their responses, and therefore the measurement of reflexive responses dominates the pain literature for nearly a century. It has been argued that although reflexive responses are important to unveil the sensory nature of pain in organisms, pain affect is equally important but largely ignored in pain studies primarily due to the lack of validated animal models. One strategy to begin to understand pain affect is to use conditioning principles to indirectly reveal the affective condition of pain. This review critically analyzed several procedures that are thought to measure affective learning of pain. The procedures regarding the current knowledge, the applications, and their advantages and disadvantages in pain research are discussed. It is proposed that these procedures should be combined with traditional reflex-based pain measurements in future studies of pain, which could greatly benefit both the understanding of neural underpinnings of pain and preclinical assessment of novel analgesics.

Indexed as

Conditioning, PsychologicalAnimalsHumansPain MeasurementSelf AdministrationSelf StimulationAnimal modelOperant conditioningPainPain affectPavlovian conditioning

Identifiers

PMID23500202
PMCPMC3708987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.