Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23500044›Full record

ArticleMethods (San Diego, Calif.)2013

Computer aided manual validation of mass spectrometry-based proteomic data.

Timothy G Curran, Bryan D Bryson, Michael Reigelhaupt, Hannah Johnson, Forest M White

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Early signaling dynamics of the epidermal growth factor receptor.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. System level dynamics of post-translational modifications.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2014
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Timothy G CurranDepartment of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Bryan D Bryson
Michael Reigelhaupt
Hannah Johnson
Forest M White

Funding

VIRUS PRODUCTION COREP30CA014051 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MATTHEW G. VANDER HEIDEN · 1985 to 2026
$93.9M
Tumor Cell Networks CenterU54CA112967 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI LAUFFENBURGER, DOUGLAS A · 2004 to 2015
$26.2M
TOXICOLOGY CORE UNITP30ES002109 · NIEHS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI LEVINE, STUART S · 1985 to 2020
$25.6M
Systems Biology of Insulin ResistanceR24DK090963 · NIDDK · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI DAVIS, ROGER J. · 2011 to 2014
$8.4M
Dynamics and Topology of Phosphotyrosine-SH2 Interaction NetworksU01CA154966 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI MAYER, BRUCE J., WHITE, FOREST M · 2011 to 2015
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014051NCI NIH HHS U01 CA154966NCI NIH HHS U54 CA112967NCI NIH HHS U54CA112967NIDDK NIH HHS R24 DK090963NIDDK NIH HHS R24DK090963NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES002109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in mass spectrometry-based proteomic technologies have increased the speed of analysis and the depth provided by a single analysis. Computational tools to evaluate the accuracy of peptide identifications from these high-throughput analyses have not kept pace with technological advances; currently the most common quality evaluation methods are based on statistical analysis of the likelihood of false positive identifications in large-scale data sets. While helpful, these calculations do not consider the accuracy of each identification, thus creating a precarious situation for biologists relying on the data to inform experimental design. Manual validation is the gold standard approach to confirm accuracy of database identifications, but is extremely time-intensive. To palliate the increasing time required to manually validate large proteomic datasets, we provide computer aided manual validation software (CAMV) to expedite the process. Relevant spectra are collected, catalogued, and pre-labeled, allowing users to efficiently judge the quality of each identification and summarize applicable quantitative information. CAMV significantly reduces the burden associated with manual validation and will hopefully encourage broader adoption of manual validation in mass spectrometry-based proteomics.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSoftwareAmino Acid SequenceDatabases, ProteinHumansMolecular Sequence DataPeptidesProteomicsResearch DesignTandem Mass SpectrometryValidation Studies as TopicPeptides

Identifiers

PMID23500044
PMCPMC3700613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.