Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23499860›Full record

ArticleActa tropica2013

Detection of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in naturally infected dogs and cats using serological, parasitological and molecular methods.

G F Enriquez, M V Cardinal, M M Orozco, A G Schijman, R E Gürtler

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta tropica, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. New insights intoFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Interrogating the transmission dynamics ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Trypanosoma cruzi vectors and reservoirs in Southern Sergipe.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

G F EnriquezLaboratorio de Eco-Epidemiología, Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
M V Cardinal
M M Orozco
A G Schijman
R E Gürtler
University of Buenos Aires · ARConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · AR

Funding

Ecoepidemiology of Chagas disease in northwest ArgentinaR01TW005836 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI KITRON, URIEL DAN · 2002 to 2006
$2.0M
FIC NIH HHS R01 TW005836FIC NIH HHS R01 TW05836
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Domestic dogs and cats are major domestic reservoir hosts of Trypanosoma cruzi and a risk factor for parasite transmission. In this study we assessed the relative performance of a polymerase chain reaction assay targeted to minicircle DNA (kDNA-PCR) in reference to conventional serological tests, a rapid dipstick test and xenodiagnosis to detect T. cruzi infection in dogs and cats from an endemic rural area in northeastern Argentina. A total of 43 dogs and 13 cats seropositive for T. cruzi by an immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and an indirect hemagglutination assay (IHA), which had been examined by xenodiagnosis, were also tested by kDNA-PCR. kDNA-PCR was nearly as sensitive as xenodiagnosis for detecting T. cruzi-infectious dogs and cats. kDNA-PCR was slightly more sensitive than xenodiagnosis in seropositive dogs (91% versus 86%, respectively) and cats (77% against 54%, respectively), but failed to detect all of the seropositive individuals. ELISA and IHA detected all xenodiagnosis-positive dogs and both outcomes largely agreed (kappa coefficient, κ=0.92), whereas both assays failed to detect all of the xenodiagnosis-positive cats and their agreement was moderate (κ=0.68). In dogs, the sensitivity of the dipstick test was 95% and agreed closely with the outcome of conventional serological tests (κ=0.82). The high sensitivity of kDNA-PCR to detect T. cruzi infections in naturally infected dogs and cats supports its application as a diagnostic tool complementary to serology and may replace the use of xenodiagnosis or hemoculture.

Indexed as

AnimalsArgentinaCat DiseasesCatsChagas DiseaseDiagnostic Tests, RoutineDog DiseasesDogsMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesParasitologySensitivity and SpecificitySerologic TestsTrypanosoma cruziVeterinary Medicine

Identifiers

PMID23499860
PMCPMC3675883
OpenAlexW2059559625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.