ArticleBiochimica et biophysica acta2013
Functional site plasticity in domain superfamilies.
Article in Biochimica et biophysica acta, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Domain Architecture Based Methods for Comparative Functional Genomics Toward Therapeutic Drug Target Discovery.Journal of molecular evolution · 2023Review
- Design of rigid protein-protein interaction inhibitors enables targeting of undruggable Mcl-1.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- CATH functional families predict functional sites in proteins.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- Biological impact of mutually exclusive exon switching.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- A CATH domain functional family based approach to identify putative cancer driver genes and driver mutations.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- CATH: expanding the horizons of structure-based functional annotations for genome sequences.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- Structural and Functional View of Polypharmacology.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Large-Scale Analysis Exploring Evolution of Catalytic Machineries and Mechanisms in Enzyme Superfamilies.Journal of molecular biology · 2016Article
- Review
- Diversity in protein domain superfamilies.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2015Review
- Functional classification of CATH superfamilies: a domain-based approach for protein function annotation.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2015Article
- The Classification and Evolution of Enzyme Function.Biophysical journal · 2015Review
- CATH FunFHMMer web server: protein functional annotations using functional family assignments.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
- The enzymatic nature of an anonymous protein sequence cannot reliably be inferred from superfamily level structural information alone.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2015Article
- CATH: comprehensive structural and functional annotations for genome sequences.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
- The evolution of enzyme function in the isomerases.Current opinion in structural biology · 2014Review
- Drug-Like Protein-Protein Interaction Modulators: Challenges and Opportunities for Drug Discovery and Chemical Biology.Molecular informatics · 2014Review
- Coverage of protein domain families with structural protein-protein interactions: current progress and future trends.Progress in biophysics and molecular biologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present, to our knowledge, the first quantitative analysis of functional site diversity in homologous domain superfamilies. Different types of functional sites are considered separately. Our results show that most diverse superfamilies are very plastic in terms of the spatial location of their functional sites. This is especially true for protein-protein interfaces. In contrast, we confirm that catalytic sites typically occupy only a very small number of topological locations. Small-ligand binding sites are more diverse than expected, although in a more limited manner than protein-protein interfaces. In spite of the observed diversity, our results also confirm the previously reported preferential location of functional sites. We identify a subset of homologous domain superfamilies where diversity is particularly extreme, and discuss possible reasons for such plasticity, i.e. structural diversity. Our results do not contradict previous reports of preferential co-location of sites among homologues, but rather point at the importance of not ignoring other sites, especially in large and diverse superfamilies. Data on sites exploited by different relatives, within each well annotated domain superfamily, has been made accessible from the CATH website in order to highlight versatile superfamilies or superfamilies with highly preferential sites. This information is valuable for system biology and knowledge of any constraints on protein interactions could help in understanding the dynamic control of networks in which these proteins participate. The novelty of our work lies in the comprehensive nature of the analysis - we have used a significantly larger dataset than previous studies - and the fact that in many superfamilies we show that different parts of the domain surface are exploited by different relatives for ligand/protein interactions, particularly in superfamilies which are diverse in sequence and structure, an observation not previously reported on such a large scale. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: The emerging dynamic view of proteins: Protein plasticity in allostery, evolution and self-assembly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.