Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23499654›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular biology2013

Statistical mechanics of Monod-Wyman-Changeux (MWC) models.

Sarah Marzen, Hernan G Garcia, Rob Phillips

Erratum issuedAbstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Cooperative Ligand-Mediated Transitions in Simple Macromolecules.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Compatibility of intracellular binding: Evolutionary design principles for metal sensors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Seeing with an extra sense.Current biology : CB · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. The Hill function is the universal Hopfield barrier for sharpness of input-output responses.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah MarzenDepartment of Physics, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-7300, USA.
Hernan G Garcia
Rob Phillips

Funding

NIH Director's Pioneer Award (RMI)DP1OD000217 · OD · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI PHILLIPS, ROB · 2004 to 2008
$4.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM08421NIH HHS DP1 OD000217NIH HHS DP1 OD000217A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 50th anniversary of the classic Monod-Wyman-Changeux (MWC) model provides an opportunity to survey the broader conceptual and quantitative implications of this quintessential biophysical model. With the use of statistical mechanics, the mathematical implementation of the MWC concept links problems that seem otherwise to have no ostensible biological connection including ligand-receptor binding, ligand-gated ion channels, chemotaxis, chromatin structure and gene regulation. Hence, a thorough mathematical analysis of the MWC model can illuminate the performance limits of a number of unrelated biological systems in one stroke. The goal of our review is twofold. First, we describe in detail the general physical principles that are used to derive the activity of MWC molecules as a function of their regulatory ligands. Second, we illustrate the power of ideas from information theory and dynamical systems for quantifying how well the output of MWC molecules tracks their sensory input, giving a sense of the "design" constraints faced by these receptors.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalModels, MolecularAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansReceptors, CholinergicReceptors, Cholinergic

Identifiers

PMID23499654
PMCPMC3786005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.