Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23498983›Full record

ArticleAcademic radiology2013

The utility of micro-CT and MRI in the assessment of longitudinal growth of liver metastases in a preclinical model of colon carcinoma.

Prachi Pandit, Samuel M Johnston, Yi Qi, Jennifer Story, Rendon Nelson, G Allan Johnson

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Academic radiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Survival impact of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Prachi PanditCenter for In Vivo Microscopy, Department of Radiology, Box 3302, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Samuel M Johnston
Yi Qi
Jennifer Story
Rendon Nelson
G Allan Johnson
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University Hospital · US

Funding

X-RAY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT WITH/WITHOUT LIVE ANIMALSP41RR005959 · NCRR · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DZAU, VICTOR J · 1990 to 2011
$16.0M
INTEGRATED CENTER FOR IN VIVO MICROSCOPYP41EB015897 · NIBIB · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSON, GEORGE ALLAN · 2012 to 2017
$7.4M
Small Animal Imaging Resource ProgramU24CA092656 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSON, GEORGE ALLAN · 2007 to 2011
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA092656NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR005959NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015897
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RATIONALE AND

objectivesLiver is a common site for distal metastases in colon and rectal cancer. Numerous clinical studies have analyzed the relative merits of different imaging modalities for detection of liver metastases. Several exciting new therapies are being investigated in preclinical models. But, technical challenges in preclinical imaging make it difficult to translate conclusions from clinical studies to the preclinical environment. This study addresses the technical challenges of preclinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and micro-computed tomography (CT) to enable comparison of state-of-the-art methods for following metastatic liver disease. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe optimized two promising preclinical protocols to enable a parallel longitudinal study tracking metastatic human colon carcinoma growth in a mouse model: T2-weighted MRI using two-shot PROPELLER (Periodically Rotated Overlapping ParallEL Lines with Enhanced Reconstruction) and contrast-enhanced micro-CT using a liposomal contrast agent. Both methods were tailored for high throughput with attention to animal support and anesthesia to limit biological stress. RESULTS AND

conclusionsEach modality has its strengths. Micro-CT permitted more rapid acquisition (<10 minutes) with the highest spatial resolution (88-micron isotropic resolution). But detection of metastatic lesions requires the use of a blood pool contrast agent, which could introduce a confound in the evaluation of new therapies. MRI was slower (30 minutes) and had lower anisotropic spatial resolution. But MRI eliminates the need for a contrast agent and the contrast-to-noise between tumor and normal parenchyma was higher, making earlier detection of small lesions possible. Both methods supported a relatively high-throughput, longitudinal study of the development of metastatic lesions.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingMicroradiographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedAnimalsColonic NeoplasmsContrast MediaFemaleImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLiver NeoplasmsMiceMice, NudeContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID23498983
PMCPMC3602803
OpenAlexW2157041918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.