Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23498940›Full record

ReviewCell2013

Epigenetics of reprogramming to induced pluripotency.

Bernadett Papp, Kathrin Plath

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 188 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
188citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

188 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Mechanomedicine.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Why are imprints unstable in pluripotent stem cells?Biochemical Society transactions · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

128 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bernadett PappDepartment of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Kathrin Plath

Funding

Roles of sumoylation and alternative polyadenylation in cellular reprogrammingP01GM099134 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI HOCHEDLINGER, KONRAD · 2011 to 2021
$20.3M
CHROMATIN AND EPIGENETIC INHERITANCEDP2OD001686 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI PLATH, KATHRIN · 2007 to 2007
$2.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM099134NIH HHS DP2 OD001686NIH HHS DP2OD001686
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reprogramming to induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) proceeds in a stepwise manner with reprogramming factor binding, transcription, and chromatin states changing during transitions. Evidence is emerging that epigenetic priming events early in the process may be critical for pluripotency induction later. Chromatin and its regulators are important controllers of reprogramming, and reprogramming factor levels, stoichiometry, and extracellular conditions influence the outcome. The rapid progress in characterizing reprogramming is benefiting applications of iPSCs and is already enabling the rational design of novel reprogramming factor cocktails. However, recent studies have also uncovered an epigenetic instability of the X chromosome in human iPSCs that warrants careful consideration.

Indexed as

Cellular ReprogrammingEpigenesis, GeneticAnimalsCell DifferentiationChromatinHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsTranscription FactorsChromatinTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID23498940
PMCPMC3602907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.