Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23498931›Full record

ReviewCell2013

Uncovering nuclear pore complexity with innovation.

Rebecca L Adams, Susan R Wente

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Identification of the NovelG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Myosin-driven transport network in plants.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Modeling of the mechano-chemical behaviour of the nuclear pore complex: current research and perspectives.Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro · 2016
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rebecca L AdamsDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Susan R Wente

Funding

New Tools for Exploring the Dynamic Interactome (Renewal)U54GM103511 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI ROUT, MICHAEL P · 2012 to 2013
$6.2M
Molecular Analysis of Nuclear Pore Complex FunctionR37GM051219 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WENTE, SUSAN R. · 2010 to 2019
$5.6M
Training Program in Stem Cell and Regenerative Developmental BiologyT32HD007502 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WRIGHT, CHRISTOPHER V · 1997 to 2022
$5.4M
REGULATION OF NUCLEAR PORE COMPLEX ASSEMBLYR01GM057438 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HETZER, MARTIN W, WENTE, SUSAN R. · 1998 to 2011
$3.5M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007502NICHD NIH HHS T32HD007502NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM057438NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM051219NIGMS NIH HHS R37GM051219NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM103511
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in imaging and reductionist approaches have provided a high-resolution understanding of nuclear pore complex structure and transport, revealing unexpected mechanistic complexities based on nucleoporin functions and specialized import and export pathways.

Indexed as

Active Transport, Cell NucleusAnimalsCell NucleusHumansModels, BiologicalNuclear PoreNuclear ProteinsNuclear Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23498931
PMCPMC3672239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.