Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23498107›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2013

State pre-emption, local control, and alcohol retail outlet density regulation.

James F Mosher, Ryan D Treffers

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Natural Observation of Alcohol Price and Promotions at Bars: Implications for Alcohol Misuse Prevention.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2022
    Observational
  7. Using Land Policy to Improve Population Health.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Outlet Type, Access to Alcohol, and Violent Crime.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2018
    Article
  14. The Impact of Single-Container Malt Liquor Sales Restrictions on Urban Crime.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Reducing the Density and Number of Tobacco Retailers: Policy Solutions and Legal Issues.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

James F MosherAlcohol Policy Consultations, Felton, California. Electronic address: jimmosher@sbcglobal.net.
Ryan D TreffersAlcohol Policy Consultations, Felton, California.

Funding

PHS HHS 200-2010-M35831
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The substantial health and economic costs of excessive alcohol consumption make its reduction a major public health and economic concern. The Community Preventive Services Task Force, based on a systematic review of the research literature, concluded that restricting alcohol retail outlet density through local land use and zoning regulations is an effective strategy for reducing these costs. Yet the implementation of the Task Force's recommendation is limited by state pre-emption, which determines the extent to which states allow local government to adopt policies and enact legislation. This article summarizes the state pre-emption doctrine, its status in the 50 states pertaining to alcohol retail outlet density regulation, and findings from state legal analyses conducted in six states. Data reflect state laws in effect as of January 1, 2012. Analyses were conducted during the 2012 calendar year. An examination of relevant state laws found five distinct pre-emption categories: exclusive state licensing, exclusive state licensing and concurrent local zoning, joint licensing, exclusive local licensing, and a mixed system. The analysis demonstrated wide variability across the states, ranging from exclusive state pre-emption to broad state delegation of authority to local governments. Pre-emption is applied differentially in many states based on retail outlet characteristics. In many cases, state pre-emption laws are ambiguous in terms of their application, leading to inconsistent and confusing court interpretations. Reforms targeting the adverse impact of state pre-emption on alcohol retail outlet density have the potential for reducing the harm associated with excessive alcohol consumption. State and local public health departments can support such reforms by implementing educational, analytic, monitoring, and technical assistance activities.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingAlcoholic BeveragesCommerceHealth PolicyHumansPublic HealthPublic Health PracticeState GovernmentUnited States

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.