Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23497673›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2013

Retrotransposition of gene transcripts leads to structural variation in mammalian genomes.

Adam D Ewing, Tracy J Ballinger, Dent Earl, Broad Institute Genome Sequencing and Analysis Program and Platform, Christopher C Harris, Li Ding, Richard K Wilson, David Haussler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
17.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Contribution ofmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. LINE-1 Retrotransposition Assays in Embryonic Stem Cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Adam D Ewing
Tracy J Ballinger
Dent Earl
Broad Institute Genome Sequencing and Analysis Program and Platform
Christopher C Harris
Li Ding
Richard K Wilson
David Haussler
University of California, Santa Cruz · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

UCSC Center for Genomic Science, and Minority Outreach ProgramP41HG002371 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI HAUSSLER, DAVID H · 2001 to 2011
$34.8M
UCSC-Buck Inst. Genome Data Analysis Center for TCGA Research Network (GDAC)U24CA143858 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI BENZ, CHRISTOPHER, HAUSSLER, DAVID H · 2009 to 2016
$8.9M
CANCER SUSCEPTIBILITY VARIANT DISCOVERY IN HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING DATAR01CA180006 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DING, LI · 2013 to 2016
$1.1M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCI NIH HHS 5U24CA143858-03NCI NIH HHS R01 CA180006NHGRI NIH HHS 5P41HG002371-12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRetroposed processed gene transcripts are an important source of material for new gene formation on evolutionary timescales. Most prior work on gene retrocopy discovery compared copies in reference genome assemblies to their source genes. Here, we explore gene retrocopy insertion polymorphisms (GRIPs) that are present in the germlines of individual humans, mice, and chimpanzees, and we identify novel gene retrocopy insertions in cancerous somatic tissues that are absent from patient-matched non-cancer genomes.

resultsThrough analysis of whole-genome sequence data, we found evidence for 48 GRIPs in the genomes of one or more humans sequenced as part of the 1,000 Genomes Project and The Cancer Genome Atlas, but which were not in the human reference assembly. Similarly, we found evidence for 755 GRIPs at distinct locations in one or more of 17 inbred mouse strains but which were not in the mouse reference assembly, and 19 GRIPs across a cohort of 10 chimpanzee genomes, which were not in the chimpanzee reference genome assembly. Many of these insertions are new members of existing gene families whose source genes are highly and widely expressed, and the majority have detectable hallmarks of processed gene retrocopy formation. We estimate the rate of novel gene retrocopy insertions in humans and chimps at roughly one new gene retrocopy insertion for every 6,000 individuals.

conclusionsWe find that gene retrocopy polymorphisms are a widespread phenomenon, present a multi-species analysis of these events, and provide a method for their ascertainment.

Indexed as

AnimalsGene OntologyGenomeGenome, HumanGenomic Structural VariationHumansMammalsMiceMolecular Sequence AnnotationMutagenesis, InsertionalNeoplasmsPan troglodytesRetroelementsRNA, MessengerRetroelementsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID23497673
PMCPMC3663115
OpenAlexW2129398737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.