Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23497511›Full record

ReviewParasites & vectors2013

Fleas infesting pets in the era of emerging extra-intestinal nematodes.

Donato Traversa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Parasites & vectors, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Exploring the Zoonotic Risk ofTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Using Proteomic Approaches to Unravel the Response ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  12. Serological and Molecular Detection ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. NexGardParasite (Paris, France) · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Evolution ofPeerJ · 2020
    Article
  20. Ecological and Socioeconomic Factors Associated withVector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.) · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Donato TraversaDepartment of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, University of Teramo, Teramo, Italy. dtraversa@unite.it

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modifications in climatic conditions, movements of hosts and goods, changes in animal phenology and human behaviour and increase of wildlife, are presently concurring in the geographic spread of vectors and cardio-respiratory nematodes, e.g. Dirofilaria immitis, Angiostrongylus vasorum, Aelurostrongylus abstrusus and Capillaria aerophila. All these factors may also influence dispersion and clinical significance of fleas, thus posing relevant challenges in those regions where other parasites are emerging at the same time. Ctenocephalides felis, Ctenocephalides canis and Pulex irritans cause discomfort, nuisance, allergic reactions, anaemia, and may transmit several pathogens, some of them are of importance for public health. The present article reviews the importance of fleas in small animal practice and their sanitary relevance for dogs, cats and humans, and discusses current control methods in the present era of emerging extra-intestinal nematodes, towards a possible changing perspective for controlling key parasites affecting companion animals.

Indexed as

AnimalsCat DiseasesCatsCommunicable Disease ControlDog DiseasesDogsFlea InfestationsHumansNematode InfectionsPetsSiphonapteraZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID23497511
PMCPMC3631128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.