ArticleBMC genomics2013
miRConnect 2.0: identification of oncogenic, antagonistic miRNA families in three human cancers.
Article in BMC genomics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hallmark discoveries in the biology of Wilms tumour.Nature reviews. Urology · 2024Review
- MicroRNAs, long non-coding RNAs, and circular RNAs and gynecological cancers: focus on metastasis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Non-canonical signaling pathway of SNAI2 induces EMT in ovarian cancer cells by suppressing miR-222-3p transcription and upregulating PDCD10.Theranostics · 2020Article
- 6mer seed toxicity in tumor suppressive microRNAs.Nature communications · 2018Article
- MicroRNA-186 suppresses lung cancer progression by targeting SIRT6.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2018Article
- Shift of microRNA profile upon glioma cell migration using patient-derived spheroids and serum-free conditions.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2017Article
- Recurrent DGCR8, DROSHA, and SIX homeodomain mutations in favorable histology Wilms tumors.Cancer cell · 2015Article
- MicroRNA expression signatures determine prognosis and survival in glioblastoma multiforme--a systematic overview.Molecular neurobiology · 2014Review
- microRNAs are biomarkers of oncogenic human papillomavirus infections.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014Article
- An Introspective Update on the Influence of miRNAs in Breast Carcinoma and Neuroblastoma Chemoresistance.Genetics research international · 2014Review
- CD95 is part of a let-7/p53/miR-34 regulatory network.PloS one · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBased on their function in cancer micro(mi)RNAs are often grouped as either tumor suppressors or oncogenes. However, miRNAs regulate multiple tumor relevant signaling pathways raising the question whether two oncogenic miRNAs could be functional antagonists by promoting different steps in tumor progression. We recently developed a method to connect miRNAs to biological function by comparing miRNA and gene array expression data from the NCI60 cell lines without using miRNA target predictions (miRConnect).
resultsWe have now extended this analysis to three primary human cancers (ovarian cancer, glioblastoma multiforme, and kidney renal clear cell carcinoma) available at the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), and have correlated the expression of the clustered miRNAs with 158 oncogenic signatures (miRConnect 2.0). We have identified functionally antagonistic groups of miRNAs. One group (the agonists), which contains many of the members of the miR-17 family, correlated with c-Myc induced genes and E2F gene signatures. A group that was directly antagonistic to the agonists in all three primary cancers contains miR-221 and miR-222. Since both miR-17 ~ 92 and miR-221/222 are considered to be oncogenic this points to a functional antagonism of different oncogenic miRNAs. Analysis of patient data revealed that in certain patients agonistic miRNAs predominated, whereas in other patients antagonists predominated. In glioblastoma a high ratio of miR-17 to miR-221/222 was predictive of better overall survival suggesting that high miR-221/222 expression is more adverse for patients than high miR-17 expression.
conclusionmiRConnect 2.0 is useful for identifying activities of miRNAs that are relevant to primary cancers. The new correlation data on miRNAs and mRNAs deregulated in three primary cancers are available at miRConnect.org.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.