ArticleBMC bioinformatics2013
An improved sequence based prediction protocol for DNA-binding proteins using SVM and comprehensive feature analysis.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.
- MEF-AlloSite: an accurate and robust Multimodel Ensemble Feature selection for the Allosteric Site identification model.Journal of cheminformatics · 2024Article
- DRBpred: A sequence-based machine learning method to effectively predict DNA- and RNA-binding residues.Computers in biology and medicine · 2024Article
- Comparative Analysis on Alignment-Based and Pretrained Feature Representations for the Identification of DNA-Binding Proteins.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- DBP-iDWT: Improving DNA-Binding Proteins Prediction Using Multi-Perspective Evolutionary Profile and Discrete Wavelet Transform.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- DNAPred_Prot: Identification of DNA-Binding Proteins Using Composition- and Position-Based Features.Applied bionics and biomechanics · 2022Article
- EpitopeVec: linear epitope prediction using deep protein sequence embeddings.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- A Feature Fusion Predictor for RNA Pseudouridine Sites with Particle Swarm Optimizer Based Feature Selection and Ensemble Learning Approach.Current issues in molecular biology · 2021Article
- PlncRNA-HDeep: plant long noncoding RNA prediction using hybrid deep learning based on two encoding styles.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Clustering and classification of virus sequence through music communication protocol and wavelet transform.Genomics · 2021Article
- Article
- Comparison of Artificial Intelligence based approaches to cell function prediction.Informatics in medicine unlocked · 2020Article
- An improved deep learning method for predicting DNA-binding proteins based on contextual features in amino acid sequences.PloS one · 2019Article
- Using a Classifier Fusion Strategy to Identify Anti-angiogenic Peptides.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Article
- Harnessing the evolutionary information on oxygen binding proteins through Support Vector Machines based modules.BMC research notes · 2018Article
- Integrating sequence and gene expression information predicts genome-wide DNA-binding proteins and suggests a cooperative mechanism.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- Identification of DNA-Binding Proteins Using Mixed Feature Representation Methods.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Article
- Improved detection of DNA-binding proteins via compression technology on PSSM information.PloS one · 2017Article
- On the prediction of DNA-binding proteins only from primary sequences: A deep learning approach.PloS one · 2017Article
- Identification of DNA-binding proteins using multi-features fusion and binary firefly optimization algorithm.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDNA-binding proteins (DNA-BPs) play a pivotal role in both eukaryotic and prokaryotic proteomes. There have been several computational methods proposed in the literature to deal with the DNA-BPs, many informative features and properties were used and proved to have significant impact on this problem. However the ultimate goal of Bioinformatics is to be able to predict the DNA-BPs directly from primary sequence.
resultsIn this work, the focus is how to transform these informative features into uniform numeric representation appropriately and improve the prediction accuracy of our SVM-based classifier for DNA-BPs. A systematic representation of some selected features known to perform well is investigated here. Firstly, four kinds of protein properties are obtained and used to describe the protein sequence. Secondly, three different feature transformation methods (OCTD, AC and SAA) are adopted to obtain numeric feature vectors from three main levels: Global, Nonlocal and Local of protein sequence and their performances are exhaustively investigated. At last, the mRMR-IFS feature selection method and ensemble learning approach are utilized to determine the best prediction model. Besides, the optimal features selected by mRMR-IFS are illustrated based on the observed results which may provide useful insights for revealing the mechanisms of protein-DNA interactions. For five-fold cross-validation over the DNAdset and DNAaset, we obtained an overall accuracy of 0.940 and 0.811, MCC of 0.881 and 0.614 respectively.
conclusionsThe good results suggest that it can efficiently develop an entirely sequence-based protocol that transforms and integrates informative features from different scales used by SVM to predict DNA-BPs accurately. Moreover, a novel systematic framework for sequence descriptor-based protein function prediction is proposed here.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.