ArticleBMC medicine2013
Income and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after primary total knee arthroplasty.
Article in BMC medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sociodemographic Differences in Long-Term Function After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Scoping Review.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Article
- Increased Rates of Unplanned Return to the Operating Room in Socioeconomically Deprived Orthopaedic Trauma Patient Populations.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025Article
- Factors Correlated with the Quality of Life after Total Knee Arthroplasties: A Literature Review.Malaysian orthopaedic journal · 2024Review
- Global mapping of institutional and hospital-based (Level II-IV) arthroplasty registries: a scoping review.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024Article
- Pain Catastrophizing and Acute Post-Surgical Pain in Knee Arthroplasty Patients: The Moderating Role of Social Support.Journal of pain research · 2024Article
- Socioeconomic factors affecting outcomes in total knee and hip arthroplasty: a systematic review on healthcare disparities.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2022Review
- Association of Rurality and Neighborhood Level Socioeconomic Deprivation with Perioperative Health Status in Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients: Analysis from a Large, Tertiary Care Hospital.The Journal of arthroplasty · 2022Article
- Insurance Payer Type and Patient Income Are Associated with Outcomes after Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.The Journal of rheumatology · 2020Article
- Polymyositis has minimal effect on primary total knee or hip arthroplasty outcomes.Clinical rheumatology · 2020Article
- Arthroplasty studies with greater than 1000 participants: analysis of follow-up methods.Arthroplasty today · 2019Article
- Medicaid or Medicare insurance payer status and household income are associated with outcomes after primary total hip arthroplasty.Clinical rheumatology · 2018Article
- Predictors of pain medication use for arthroplasty pain after revision total knee arthroplasty.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo assess whether income is associated with patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
methodsWe used prospectively collected data from the Mayo Clinic Total Joint Registry to assess the association of income with index knee functional improvement, moderate to severe pain and moderate to severe activity limitation at 2-year and 5-year follow-up after primary TKA using multivariable-adjusted logistic regression analyses.
resultsThere were 7, 139 primary TKAs at 2 years and 4, 234 at 5 years. In multivariable-adjusted analyses, at 2-year follow-up, compared to income > US$45, 000, lower incomes of ≤ US$35, 000 and > US$35, 000 to 45, 000 were associated (1) significantly with moderate to severe pain with an odds ratio (OR) 0.61 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.94) (P = 0.02) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.94) (P = 0.02); and (2) trended towards significance for moderate to severe activity limitation with OR 0.78 (95% CI 0.60 to 1.02) (P = 0.07) and no significant association with OR 0.96 (95% CI 0.78 to 1.20) (P = 0.75), respectively. At 5 years, odds were not statistically significantly different by income, although numerically they favored lower income. In multivariable-adjusted analyses, overall improvement in knee function was rated as 'better' slightly more often at 2 years by patients with income in the ≤ US$35, 000 range compared to patients with income > US$45, 000, with an OR 1.9 (95% CI 1.0 to 3.6) (P = 0.06).
conclusionsWe found that patients with lower income had better pain outcomes compared to patients with higher income. There was more improvement in knee function, and a trend towards less overall activity limitation after primary TKA in lower income patients compared to those with higher incomes. Insights into mediators of these relationships need to be investigated to understand how income influences outcomes after TKA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.