Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23497257›Full record

SynthesisHealth and quality of life outcomes2013

Responsiveness of the MOS-HIV and EQ-5D in HIV-infected adults receiving antiretroviral therapies.

Albert W Wu, Kristin A Hanson, Gale Harding, Seema Haider, Margaret Tawadrous, Alexandra Khachatryan, Chris L Pashos, Kit N Simpson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05835635 (Level of Satisfaction and Quality of Life in People Living With HIV in Chile, Who Switch From Oral Therapy to Long-acting Injectable Cabotegravir + Rilpivirine), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05835635 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Level of Satisfaction and Quality of Life in People Living With HIV in Chile, Who Switch From Oral Therapy to Long-acting Injectable Cabotegravir + Rilpivirine

TypeobservationalSponsorPontificia Universidad Catolica de ChileRan2025 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsPatient Satisfaction, Patient Preference, Quality of Life, Acceptability of Health Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Antiretroviral Therapy Reduces T-cell Activation and Immune Exhaustion Markers in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Controllers.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Capturing what matters: updating NICE methods guidance on measuring and valuing health.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Albert W WuJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Kristin A Hanson
Gale Harding
Seema Haider
Margaret Tawadrous
Alexandra Khachatryan
Chris L Pashos
Kit N Simpson
Pfizer (United States) · USJohns Hopkins University · USMedical University of South Carolina · USPharmerit (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelection of an appropriate patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument for a clinical trial requires knowledge of the instrument's responsiveness to detecting treatment effects. The purpose of this study was to examine the responsiveness of two health-related quality of life (HRQL) instruments used in clinical trials involving HIV-infected adults: the HIV-targeted Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey (MOS-HIV), and a generic measure, the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D).

methodsA systematic review identified clinical trials using the MOS-HIV or EQ-5D to assess outcomes for HIV-infected adults. Data abstracted from each study included study type, treatment regimen(s), PRO results, and effect size (either reported or calculated). Effect size was calculated as the difference between baseline and follow-up mean scores divided by the baseline standard deviation. Magnitude was categorized as small (d=0.20), medium (d=0.50), and large (d=0.80).

resultsBetween 2005 and 2010, the MOS-HIV was administered in 12 trials. Significant differences were observed between groups and over time in physical health summary (PHS) and mental health summary (MHS) scores (P<0.05) in subjects switching therapy after experiencing Grade-2 adverse events. Effect sizes were medium (0.55 and 0.49 for PHS and MHS, respectively) among treatment-naïve adults beginning therapy (two studies), but negligible among treatment-experienced adults (0.04 and 0.13 for PHS and MHS, respectively; three studies). The EQ-5D was used in five trials between 2001 and 2010. It was responsive to occurrences of adverse events and opportunistic infections, with small-to-medium effect sizes (range 0.30-0.50) in each of its five dimensions.

conclusionsA systematic review of PRO study results showed both the MOS-HIV and EQ-5D were responsive to changes between groups and/or over time in treatment-naïve HIV-infected patients. These instruments may be used either individually or together in clinical trials to measure changes in HRQL.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-HIV AgentsAntiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveHIV InfectionsHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID23497257
PMCPMC3602001
OpenAlexW2150560731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.