Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23497110›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health : a global access science source2013

Exposure to fogger trucks and breast cancer incidence in the Long Island Breast Cancer Study Project: a case-control study.

Alexandra J White, Susan L Teitelbaum, Mary S Wolff, Steven D Stellman, Alfred I Neugut, Marilie D Gammon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health : a global access science source, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Exposure to Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals and Risk of Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Self-reported residential pesticide use and survival after breast cancer.International journal of hygiene and environmental health · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandra J WhiteDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. whitea@unc.edu
Susan L Teitelbaum
Mary S Wolff
Steven D Stellman
Alfred I Neugut
Marilie D Gammon
Columbia University · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Melissa A. Troester · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
Breast Cancer Genomics in Windows of Susceptibility to Endocrine DisruptorsU01ES019459 · NIEHS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI CHEN, JIA, TEITELBAUM, SUSAN L · 2010 to 2014
$2.6M
NIEHS NIH HHS ES019459NIEHS NIH HHS ES07018NIEHS NIH HHS ES10126NIEHS NIH HHS ES66572NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFew studies have supported an association between breast cancer and DDT, usually assessed with biomarkers that cannot discern timing of exposure, or differentiate between the accumulation of chronic low-dose versus acute high-dose exposures in the past. Previous studies suggest that an association may be evident only among women exposed to DDT during biologically susceptible windows, or among those diagnosed with estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor-positive (ER+PR+) breast cancer subtypes. Self-reported acute exposure to a fogger truck, which sprayed DDT prior to 1972, was hypothesized to increase the risk of breast cancer, particularly among women exposed at a young age or diagnosed with ER+PR+ breast cancer.

methodsWe examined these possibilities in the Long Island Breast Cancer Study Project (LIBCSP) (1,508 cases, 1,556 controls), which included exposure assessment by structured questionnaire and serum samples collected between 1996-1998, using adjusted logistic and polytomous regression to estimate ORs and 95% CIs.

resultsWomen with ER+PR+ breast cancer had a 44% increased odds of ever seeing a pre-1972 fogger truck compared to other subtypes (OR = 1.44; 95% CI 1.08-1.93). However, there was little variation in the observed increase in breast cancer risk when considering all women who reported seeing a pre-1972 fogger truck at their residence (OR = 1.16; 95% CI 0.98, 1.37), or during hypothesized susceptible windows. Self-reported acute exposure was not correlated with serum concentrations, a biomarker of long-term exposure.

conclusionsThese findings support the hypothesis that seeing a fogger truck, a proxy measure for acute DDT exposure, may be associated with ER+PR+ tumors, the most commonly diagnosed breast cancer subtype among American women.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposureAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAir PollutantsBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesChildDDTEnvironmental MonitoringFemaleHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedNew YorkAir PollutantsDDTReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID23497110
PMCPMC3639887
OpenAlexW2161993487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.