Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23496955›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2013

Comparative genomics of parasitic silkworm microsporidia reveal an association between genome expansion and host adaptation.

Guoqing Pan, Jinshan Xu, Tian Li, Qingyou Xia, Shao-Lun Liu, Guojie Zhang, Songgang Li, Chunfeng Li, Handeng Liu, Liu Yang and 23 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 167 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Serpin 4/5 ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A Putative TRAPα Protein of MicrosporidiaJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Guoqing PanState Key Laboratory of Silkworm Genome Biology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Jinshan Xu
Tian Li
Qingyou Xia
Shao-Lun Liu
Guojie Zhang
Songgang Li
Chunfeng Li
Handeng Liu
Liu Yang
Tie Liu
Xi Zhang
Zhengli Wu
Wei Fan
Xiaoqun Dang
Heng Xiang
Meilin Tao
Yanhong Li
Junhua Hu
Zhi Li
Lipeng Lin
Jie Luo
Lina Geng
LinLing Wang
Mengxian Long
Yongji Wan
Ningjia He
Ze Zhang
Cheng Lu
Patrick J Keeling
Jun Wang
Zhonghuai Xiang
Zeyang Zhou
Southwest University · CNState Key Laboratory of Silkworm Genomic BiologyBGI Group (China) · CNChongqing Normal University · CNUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicrosporidian Nosema bombycis has received much attention because the pébrine disease of domesticated silkworms results in great economic losses in the silkworm industry. So far, no effective treatment could be found for pébrine. Compared to other known Nosema parasites, N. bombycis can unusually parasitize a broad range of hosts. To gain some insights into the underlying genetic mechanism of pathological ability and host range expansion in this parasite, a comparative genomic approach is conducted. The genome of two Nosema parasites, N. bombycis and N. antheraeae (an obligatory parasite to undomesticated silkworms Antheraea pernyi), were sequenced and compared with their distantly related species, N. ceranae (an obligatory parasite to honey bees).

resultsOur comparative genomics analysis show that the N. bombycis genome has greatly expanded due to the following three molecular mechanisms: 1) the proliferation of host-derived transposable elements, 2) the acquisition of many horizontally transferred genes from bacteria, and 3) the production of abundnant gene duplications. To our knowledge, duplicated genes derived not only from small-scale events (e.g., tandem duplications) but also from large-scale events (e.g., segmental duplications) have never been seen so abundant in any reported microsporidia genomes. Our relative dating analysis further indicated that these duplication events have arisen recently over very short evolutionary time. Furthermore, several duplicated genes involving in the cytotoxic metabolic pathway were found to undergo positive selection, suggestive of the role of duplicated genes on the adaptive evolution of pathogenic ability.

conclusionsGenome expansion is rarely considered as the evolutionary outcome acting on those highly reduced and compact parasitic microsporidian genomes. This study, for the first time, demonstrates that the parasitic genomes can expand, instead of shrink, through several common molecular mechanisms such as gene duplication, horizontal gene transfer, and transposable element expansion. We also showed that the duplicated genes can serve as raw materials for evolutionary innovations possibly contributing to the increase of pathologenic ability. Based on our research, we propose that duplicated genes of N. bombycis should be treated as primary targets for treatment designs against pébrine. The genome data and annotation information of N. bombycis and N.antheraeae were submitted to GenBank (Accession numbers ACJZ01000001 -ACJZ01003558).

Indexed as

Gene DuplicationAnimalsBase SequenceBombyxDNA Transposable ElementsGene Transfer, HorizontalGenomicsHost-Parasite InteractionsMicrosporidiaMolecular Sequence AnnotationMolecular Sequence DataDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID23496955
PMCPMC3614468
OpenAlexW2097050932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.