Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23496831›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2013

DNA damage activates a complex transcriptional response in murine lymphocytes that includes both physiological and cancer-predisposition programs.

Cynthia L Innes, Jill E Hesse, Stela S Palii, Beth A Helmink, Abigail J Holub, Barry P Sleckman, Richard S Paules

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Immature Lymphocytes InhibitJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cynthia L InnesEnvironmental Stress and Cancer Group, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
Jill E Hesse
Stela S Palii
Beth A Helmink
Abigail J Holub
Barry P Sleckman
Richard S Paules

Funding

Gene Expression and MicroarraysZICES102445 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GERRISH, KEVIN · 2009 to 2025
$31.6M
THE V(D)J RECOMBINATION REACTION AND ITS IMPACT ON LYMPHOCYTE DEVELOPMENTR01AI047829 · NIAID · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI SLECKMAN, BARRY P · 2000 to 2021
$7.0M
Molecular Analysis Of Cell Cycle Control During CarcinogenesisZIAES021157 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI PAULES, RICHARD · 2009 to 2013
$5.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI047829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDouble strand (ds) DNA breaks are a form of DNA damage that can be generated from both genotoxic exposures and physiologic processes, can disrupt cellular functions and can be lethal if not repaired properly. Physiologic dsDNA breaks are generated in a variety of normal cellular functions, including the RAG endonuclease-mediated rearrangement of antigen receptor genes during the normal development of lymphocytes. We previously showed that physiologic breaks initiate lymphocyte development-specific transcriptional programs. Here we compare transcriptional responses to physiological DNA breaks with responses to genotoxic DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation.

resultsWe identified a central lymphocyte-specific transcriptional response common to both physiologic and genotoxic breaks, which includes many lymphocyte developmental processes. Genotoxic damage causes robust alterations to pathways associated with B cell activation and increased proliferation, suggesting that genotoxic damage initiates not only the normal B cell maturation processes but also mimics activated B cell response to antigenic agents. Notably, changes including elevated levels of expression of Kras and mmu-miR-155 and the repression of Socs1 were observed following genotoxic damage, reflecting induction of a cancer-prone phenotype.

conclusionsComparing these transcriptional responses provides a greater understanding of the mechanisms cells use in the differentiation between types of DNA damage and the potential consequences of different sources of damage. These results suggest genotoxic damage may induce a unique cancer-prone phenotype and processes mimicking activated B cell response to antigenic agents, as well as the normal B cell maturation processes.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedAnimalsDNA DamageEndonucleasesGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalLymphocytesMiceMicroRNAsNeoplasmsProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling 1 ProteinSuppressor of Cytokine Signaling ProteinsTranscription, GeneticEndonucleasesHras protein, mouseMicroRNAsMirn155 microRNA, mouseProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Socs1 protein, mouseSuppressor of Cytokine Signaling 1 ProteinSuppressor of Cytokine Signaling Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23496831
PMCPMC3602184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.