ArticleBMC genomics2013
DNA damage activates a complex transcriptional response in murine lymphocytes that includes both physiological and cancer-predisposition programs.
Article in BMC genomics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- NF-κB/RelA signaling required for CD40-induced humoral immunity depends on specific NEMO lysine residues in mice.The EMBO journal · 2026Article
- ATM-dependent Phosphorylation of Nemo SQ Motifs Is Dispensable for Nemo-mediated Gene Expression Changes in Response to DNA Double-Strand Breaks.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2024Article
- Progression of Notch signaling regulation of B cells under radiation exposure.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Nuclease-independent functions of RAG1 direct distinct DNA damage responses in B cells.EMBO reports · 2023Article
- Genotoxic Mechanism of Action of TBBPA, TBBPS and Selected Bromophenols in Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Full length RAG2 expression enhances the DNA damage response in pre-B cells.Immunobiology · 2021Article
- The Determinants of B Cell Receptor Signaling as Prototype Molecular Biomarkers of Leukemia.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- DNA damage responses in murine Pre-B cells with genetic deficiencies in damage response genes.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2020Article
- At the intersection of DNA damage and immune responses.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2019Review
- Immature Lymphocytes InhibitJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2017Article
- Article
- Concerted action of Nrf2-ARE pathway, MRN complex, HMGB1 and inflammatory cytokines - implication in modification of radiation damage.Redox biology · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDouble strand (ds) DNA breaks are a form of DNA damage that can be generated from both genotoxic exposures and physiologic processes, can disrupt cellular functions and can be lethal if not repaired properly. Physiologic dsDNA breaks are generated in a variety of normal cellular functions, including the RAG endonuclease-mediated rearrangement of antigen receptor genes during the normal development of lymphocytes. We previously showed that physiologic breaks initiate lymphocyte development-specific transcriptional programs. Here we compare transcriptional responses to physiological DNA breaks with responses to genotoxic DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation.
resultsWe identified a central lymphocyte-specific transcriptional response common to both physiologic and genotoxic breaks, which includes many lymphocyte developmental processes. Genotoxic damage causes robust alterations to pathways associated with B cell activation and increased proliferation, suggesting that genotoxic damage initiates not only the normal B cell maturation processes but also mimics activated B cell response to antigenic agents. Notably, changes including elevated levels of expression of Kras and mmu-miR-155 and the repression of Socs1 were observed following genotoxic damage, reflecting induction of a cancer-prone phenotype.
conclusionsComparing these transcriptional responses provides a greater understanding of the mechanisms cells use in the differentiation between types of DNA damage and the potential consequences of different sources of damage. These results suggest genotoxic damage may induce a unique cancer-prone phenotype and processes mimicking activated B cell response to antigenic agents, as well as the normal B cell maturation processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.