ReviewDrug design, development and therapy2013
Alemtuzumab: evidence for its potential in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
Review in Drug design, development and therapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of alemtuzumab in the development of secondary autoimmunity in multiple Sclerosis: a systematic review.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2024Pooled it
- Alemtuzumab versus interferon beta 1a for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Effect of Different Treatments on Retinal Thickness Changes in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: A Review.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Review
- Microglial Phagocytosis-Rational but Challenging Therapeutic Target in Multiple Sclerosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Treatment with alemtuzumab or rituximab after fingolimod withdrawal in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis is effective and safe.Journal of neurology · 2019Observational
- Practical Evidence-Based Recommendations for Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Who Want to Have Children.Neurology and therapy · 2018Review
- Review
- Reliable measurements of brain atrophy in individual patients with multiple sclerosis.Brain and behavior · 2016Article
- Disease-modifying treatments for multiple sclerosis - a review of approved medications.European journal of neurology · 2016Review
- Blood B Cell and Regulatory Subset Content in Multiple Sclerosis Patients.Journal of multiple sclerosis · 2015Article
- Comparative efficacy of alemtuzumab and established treatment in the management of multiple sclerosis.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2015Review
- New and emerging immune-targeted drugs for the treatment of multiple sclerosis.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2014Review
- Immunosuppressive peptides and their therapeutic applications.Drug discovery today · 2014Review
- Review
- Emerging cell and cytokine targets in rheumatoid arthritis.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2014Review
- Alemtuzumab in the treatment of multiple sclerosis.Journal of inflammation research · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alemtuzumab (previously known as Campath(®)) is a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against the CD52 antigen on mature lymphocytes that results in lymphopenia and subsequent modification of the immune repertoire. Here we explore evidence for its efficacy and safety in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. One Phase II and two Phase III trials of alemtuzumab versus active comparator (interferon beta-1a) have been reported. Two of these rater-blinded randomized studies assessed clinical and radiological outcomes in treatment-naïve patients; one explored patients who had relapsed despite first-line therapy. Compared to interferon beta-1a, alemtuzumab reduced the relapse rate by 49%-74% (P < 0.0001), and in two studies it reduced the risk of sustained disability accumulation by 42%-71% (P < 0.01). In one study (Comparison of Alemtuzumab and Rebif Efficacy in Multiple Sclerosis; CARE-MS1), there was no significant difference compared to interferon, perhaps reflecting the surprisingly low frequency of disability events in the comparator group. After alemtuzumab, the Expanded Disability Status Scale score improved by 0.14-1.2 points, culminating in a net advantage with alemtuzumab of 0.41-0.77 points over interferon in the CAMMS223 and CARE-MS2 trials (both P < 0.001). Radiological markers of new lesion formation and brain atrophy following alemtuzumab were significantly improved when compared to interferon in all studies. Adverse events were more common following alemtuzumab than interferon beta-1a (7.2-8.66 versus 4.9-5.7 events per person-year). While infusion reactions are the most common, autoimmunity is the most concerning; within Phase III studies, thyroid disorders (17%-18% versus 5%-6%) and immune thrombocytopenic purpura (1% versus 0%) were reported in patients taking alemtuzumab and interferon beta-1a, respectively. All patients responded to conventional therapy. One patient taking alemtuzumab in the Phase II study suffered a fatal intracranial hemorrhage following immune thrombocytopenic purpura, heralding assiduous monitoring of all patients thereafter. Alemtuzumab has been submitted for licensing in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the United States and Europe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.