ArticleEuropean radiology2013
Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensities are not visible using 3D CUBE FLAIR sequence.
Article in European radiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cerebral hemodynamics associated with fluid-attenuated inversion recovery hyperintense vessels in patients with extracranial carotid artery stenosis.Neuroradiology · 2020Article
- Vertebral artery dissection associated with familial Mediterranean fever and Behçet's disease.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2019Article
- Magnetic resonance post-contrast vascular hyperintensities at 3 T: a new highly sensitive sign of vascular occlusion in acute ischaemic stroke.European radiology · 2018Article
- Comparison of 3D double inversion recovery and 2D STIR FLAIR MR sequences for the imaging of optic neuritis: pilot study.European radiology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveFluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) vascular hyperintensities (FVH), initially described on 2D FLAIR images, are a useful imaging marker in patients with acute ischaemic stroke. We aimed to compare the sensitivity of the 3D CUBE FLAIR sequence with 2D FLAIR for the detection of FVH.
methodsForty-seven consecutive patients admitted for a suspected stroke were explored by 2D and 3D CUBE FLAIR MR sequences at 1.5 and 3 T. Three blinded readers assessed FVH defined as hyperintensities within cerebral arteries. Location of FVH, acute brain infarct and arterial stenosis were also assessed. 2D images were compared with 3D images for the detection of FVH. Agreement between readers was assessed.
resultsOf the 47 patients, 21 FVHs were observed on 2D FLAIR images of 15 patients (11 with acute brain infarct and 11 with an arterial stenosis). No FVH was visualised on 3D CUBE FLAIR images for either proximal or distal locations. Agreement between readers was excellent.
conclusionFVHs are not visible using 3D CUBE FLAIR images. This study suggests that, in suspected acute ischaemic stroke, the assessment of FVH should only be performed on conventional 2D FLAIR images. KEY POINTS: • Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) vascular hyperintensities (FVH) are of neuroradiological importance. • FVHs are useful imaging markers in patients with an acute ischaemic stroke. • FVHs are not visible using 3D CUBE FLAIR images. • Assessment of FVH should be performed on conventional 2D FLAIR images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23494495What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.