ArticleEndocrine2013
Secondary malignancy in patients with sporadic neuroendocrine neoplasia.
Article in Endocrine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Second Primary Malignancies in Patients with a Neuroendocrine Neoplasm in England.Neuroendocrinology · 2023Article
- Article
- Second cancers in patients with neuroendocrine tumors.PloS one · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incidence of neuroendocrine neoplasias (NENs), especially of the gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP), system relatively increased over the past decades, as a result of advanced diagnostic tools, a better clinical awareness, and distinguished pathological diagnostic recognition. Previous reports hypothesized an increased risk for secondary malignancies in patients with NEN especially in GEP-NENs. The present study was designed to investigate the coincidence of NENs and secondary malignancies in a large patient collective. A retrospective analysis was performed on 161 patients (85 female and 76 male) with NEN of various origins. Clinical data of these patients, different classification systems (TNM/WHO), proliferations-based grading, and clinical follow-up were collected and analyzed. Out of 143 patients with a sporadic NEN, 15 (10.49 %) patients were identified with secondary malignant tumors. Median age at the time of the primary operation for NEN was 65 years, whereas the median age of initial diagnosis of associated tumors was 59 years. Mean follow-up time was 61 months. The risk of developing a secondary malignancy was most elevated for patients with an NEN of the lung, the stomach, and the ileum (60, 50 and 20 %, respectively). The spectrum of secondary malignancies included various types of cancer. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis shows a difference suggesting that patients with a secondary malignancy demonstrate a worse survival compared to patients without a secondary tumor; no significance was detected (p = 0.349). Our data suggest that secondary malignancies in patients with NEN's especially in GEP-NENs are found more frequently than in general population. Therefore, patients with NEN need a continuous and detailed follow-up. The reason for the increased incidence of secondary malignancies in patients with NENs remains to be elucidated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.