ArticleDer Nervenarzt2013
[Developmental process of DGPPN quality indicators].
Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05181982 (Wissenschaftliche Evaluation Des Modellvorhabens), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Wissenschaftliche Evaluation Des Modellvorhabens (§ 64b SGB V) am Pfalzklinikum (EVA_Pfalz)
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Developing quality indicators for cross-sectoral psycho-oncology in Germany: combining the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method with a Delphi technique.BMC health services research · 2023Pooled it
- Identifying primary care quality indicators for people with serious mental illness: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017Pooled it
- Regional variations in healthcare in people living with dementia in Germany: protocol for a mixed-methods study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Quality indicators for mental healthcare in the Danube region: results from a pilot feasibility study.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2021Article
- [Quality psychiatry and destigmatization : Can quality psychiatry and psychotherapy contribute to destigmatization of mental illnesses?]Der Nervenarzt · 2020Review
- [Frequency of coercive measures as a quality indicator for psychiatric hospitals?]Der Nervenarzt · 2019Article
- The influence of cross-sectoral treatment models on patients with mental disorders in Germany: study protocol of a nationwide long-term evaluation study (EVA64).BMC psychiatry · 2018Article
- [DGPPN recommendations on quality indicators for schizophrenia].Der Nervenarzt · 2017Article
- [Voluntary and mandatory quality assurance in mental health care: European examples].Der Nervenarzt · 2015Article
- [Assessment of quality indicators with routine data: Presentation of a feasibility test in ten specialist clinics for psychiatry and psychotherapy].Der Nervenarzt · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundValid and feasible quality indicators can measure healthcare quality and show potential for improvement in care. The German Association for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (DGPPN) has developed trans-sectoral quality indicator sets for four mental disorders with high prevalence (alcohol dependence, dementia, depression and schizophrenia). MATERIAL AND
methodThe DGPPN followed a structured multistage process and used guideline recommendations and the results of systematic evidence searches as the basis for the development of these quality indicators. This was followed by a structured consensus process for all quality indicators.
resultsFour evidence and consensus-based, diagnosis-specific and trans-sectoral quality indicator sets have been developed.
conclusionIt is possible to develop quality indicators on the basis of guideline recommendations. The implementation of the DGPPN quality indicators will play a crucial role in order to evaluate their utility and feasibility as quality measures for German mental healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23494246What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.