Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23494200›Full record

ArticleDie Naturwissenschaften2013

Revisiting chronodisruption: when the physiological nexus between internal and external times splits in humans.

Thomas C Erren, Russel J Reiter

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Die Naturwissenschaften, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04113876 (Circadian Health in Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Units and Hospitalization), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04113876 completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Circadian Health in Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Units and Hospitalization (CHRONOHOSPI)

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorInstituto de Salud Carlos IIIRan2019 to 2022Enrolled975ConditionsChronobiology Disorders
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Association between Chronotype, Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Circadian disruption: What do we actually mean?The European journal of neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thomas C ErrenInstitute and Policlinic for Occupational Medicine, Environmental Medicine, and Prevention Research, University of Cologne, Lindenthal, Cologne, Germany. tim.erren@uni-koeln.de
Russel J Reiter

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this Concepts & Synthesis paper, we expand the definition of chronodisruption in humans by proposing that it can be operationalized as the split nexus of internal and external times. With this premise, we suggest how chronotype may be used as a temporal marker (chronomarker) of exposure to chronodisruption in studies of cancer, and beyond, offer cancer risk predictions for observational research on the basis of a chronotype-related hypothesis and corollary, and point to first empirical data in humans. In an a priori way, we examine possible outcomes and perspectives for preventive measures following from our rationale and the suggested chronobiology-driven studies and close with overall advances of chronodisruption research.

Indexed as

Chronic DiseaseCircadian RhythmEpidemiologic Research DesignHumansNeoplasms

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.