Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23494186›Full record

ReviewDrugs2013

LDL cholesterol goals in high-risk patients: how low do we go and how do we get there?

Joost Besseling, Julian van Capelleveen, John J P Kastelein, G Kees Hovingh

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Niacin: an old lipid drug in a new NADJournal of lipid research · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. [LDL-cholesterol and cardiovascular events: the lower the better?]Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2018
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joost BesselingDepartment of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, Meibergdreef 15, Room F4-139, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Julian van Capelleveen
John J P Kastelein
G Kees Hovingh
Academic Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is widely recognised that low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is one of the most important and modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Statins (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors) have consistently been shown to decrease both LDL-C and CVD risk in almost all patient categories, with the exception of heart and kidney failure as well as advanced aortic stenosis. As a consequence, statins have become the cornerstone in current prevention guidelines. In patients who do not reach the LDL-C target, combination therapy with additional LDL-C lowering drugs (e.g. ezetimibe, bile acid sequestrants or fibrates) should be considered. Guidelines provide different LDL-C levels to strive for, depending on the CVD risk. In this review, we describe the rationale for these LDL-C targets and how these goals might be reached by current and future therapies.

Indexed as

Anticholesteremic AgentsCardiovascular DiseasesCholesterol, LDLDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHypercholesterolemiaRisk FactorsAnticholesteremic AgentsCholesterol, LDLHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID23494186
OpenAlexW2014979854

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.