ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2013
Evolution of physician-hospital alignment models: a case study of comanagement.
Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecently, quality, financial, and regulatory demands have driven physicians to seek alignment opportunities with hospitals. The motivation for alignment on the part of physicians and hospitals is now accelerating because the new paradigm under healthcare reform requires an increased focus on improving quality, cost, and efficiency. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We (1) identify the key drivers for physician-hospital alignment models; (2) summarize comanagement as a physician-hospital alignment model; and (3) explore a detailed case study of comanagement as an option to better align physicians with hospital goals on quality, safety, and outcomes.
methodsA Medline abstract review was performed that identified 45 references that discuss options for physician-hospital alignment. None of the articles identified provide a detailed example of successful alignment structures. A detailed case study of a successful comanagement alignment program is reviewed.
resultsThe key drivers for alignment are inpatient growth rates, declining reimbursements, and the opportunity to improve quality, decrease costs, and increase efficiency. Two general strategies of alignment involve noneconomic and/or economic integration. In our example, comanagement with economic integration was chosen as the preferred structure for physician-hospital alignment.
conclusionsThe choice of structure will vary depending on the existing relationships and governance of the hospital and the physicians in the targeted area of focus. The measure of success in building physician-hospital alignment is measured in improvements in care for the patient, reduced cost of care delivery, and improved relations between physicians and hospital leadership.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.