Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23494109›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2013

Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Risk factors, clinical predictors, and management (single center experience).

Ayman El Nakeeb, Tarek Salah, Ahmad Sultan, Mohamed El Hemaly, Waleed Askr, Helmy Ezzat, Emad Hamdy, Ehab Atef, Ehab El Hanafy, Ahmed El-Geidie and 2 more

6 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 6 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 78 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01859806 nacompletednot on this map

Isolated Roux Loop Pancreaticojejunostomy Versus Pancreaticogastrostomy After Pancreaticoduodenectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorMansoura UniversityRan2011 to 2013Enrolled80ConditionsPancreatic Fistula After PancreaticoduodenectomyArmsPancreaticogastrostomy group, Isolated Roux PJ group
NCT02142517 nacompletednot on this map

Comparative Study Between Duct to Mucosa and Invagination Pancreaticojejunostomy After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Prospective Randomized Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorMansoura UniversityRan2011 to 2013Enrolled120ConditionsPancreatic Anastomotic LeakArmsDuct to mucosa PJ group, Invagination PJ group
NCT02474914 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Octreotide in the Prevention of Postoperative Complications After Pancreaticodudenectomy in Patients With Soft Pancreas and Non-dilated Pancreatic Duct: A Prospective Randomized Trial"

TypeinterventionalSponsorMansoura UniversityRan2014 to 2017Enrolled104ConditionsPeriampullary Carcinoma ResectableArmsOctreotide, Placebo
NCT02807701 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Study Between Minimally Invasive Pancreatico-duodenectomy and Open Pancreatico-duodenectomy for Periampullary Tumors

TypeinterventionalSponsorMansoura UniversityRan2016 to 2018Enrolled40ConditionsPancreaticoduodenectomyArmsLaparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy, Open pancreaticoduodenectomy
NCT03671031 completednot on this map

Isolated Roux Loop Versus Conventional Pancreaticojejunostomy Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy

TypeobservationalSponsorInonu UniversityRan2009 to 2018Enrolled109ConditionsPancreatic FistulaArmsisolated roux loop, single loop
NCT03800940 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Trans-drain Occlusion for Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula- A Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Taiwan University HospitalRan2019 to 2023Enrolled60ConditionsPancreatic FistulaArmsFistulography and trans-drain occlusion, Fistulography
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized study.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2014
    Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ayman El NakeebDepartment of Surgery, Gastroenterology Surgical Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt. elnakeebayman@yahoo.com
Tarek Salah
Ahmad Sultan
Mohamed El Hemaly
Waleed Askr
Helmy Ezzat
Emad Hamdy
Ehab Atef
Ehab El Hanafy
Ahmed El-Geidie
Mohamed Abdel Wahab
Talaat Abdallah

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains a challenge even at high-volume centers.

methodsThis study was designed to analyze perioperative risk factors for POPF after PD and evaluate the factors that predict the extent and severity of leak. Demographic data, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were collected.

resultsA total of 471 consecutive patients underwent PD in our center. Fifty-seven patients (12.1 %) developed a POPF of any type; 21 patients (4.5 %) had a fistula type A, 22 patients (4.7 %) had a fistula type B, and the remaining 14 patients (3 %) had a POPF type C. Cirrhotic liver (P = 0.05), BMI > 25 kg/m(2) (P = 0.0001), soft pancreas (P = 0.04), pancreatic duct diameter <3 mm (0.0001), pancreatic duct located <3 mm from the posterior border (P = 0.02) were significantly associated with POPF. With the multivariate analysis, both BMI and pancreatic duct diameter were demonstrated to be independent factors. The hospital mortality in this series was 11 patients (2.3 %), and the development of POPF type C was associated with a significantly increased mortality (7/14 patients). The following factors were predictors of clinically evident POPF: a postoperative day (POD) 1 and 5 drain amylase level >4,000 IU/L, WBC, pancreatic duct diameter <3 mm, and pancreatic texture.

conclusionsCirrhotic liver, BMI, soft pancreas, pancreatic duct diameter <3 mm, pancreatic duct near the posterior border are risk factors for development of POPF. In addition a drain amylase level >4,000 IU/L on POD 1 and 5, WBC, pancreatic duct diameter, pancreatic texture may be predictors of POPF B, C.

Indexed as

PancreaticoduodenectomyAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnastomotic LeakBody Mass IndexChildFemaleHospital MortalityHumansLiver CirrhosisMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic DuctsPredictive Value of Tests

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.