Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23493797›Full record

ArticleIranian journal of basic medical sciences2012

Identification of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Species Isolated from Water Samples Using Phenotypic and Molecular Methods and Determination of their Antibiotic Resistance Patterns by E- Test Method, in Isfahan, Iran.

Sharareh Moghim, Ensieh Sarikhani, Bahram Nasr Esfahani, Jamshid Faghri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian journal of basic medical sciences, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Comparative evaluation of MALDI-ToF mass spectrometry and Sanger sequencing of theFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Isolation and identification of non-tuberculous mycobacteria from aquarium fish in Ilam, Iran.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Heat-killedFood science & nutrition · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Safety of heat-killedEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sharareh MoghimDepartment of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Ensieh Sarikhani
Bahram Nasr Esfahani
Jamshid Faghri

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMany studies have shown epidemiological links between strains isolated in tap water, and those isolated from patients. Molecular methods linked to PCR are more reliable and faster for identification of non- tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). In this study molecular methods were used for identification and typing of NTM. MATERIALS AND

methodsFive hundred ml of 85 water samples was passed through 0.45 μm filters. The filters were transferred directly onto 7H10 Middle Brook solid media, containing 15% OADC. PCR for 16S rRNA was done and the PCR product (1500 bp) was sequenced. PRA of the hsp65 gene was investigated to identify the species of isolates. For evaluation of susceptibility of NTM to antimycobacterial agents, E-test method was used.

resultThe genus of 26 isolated NTM was confirmed by 16s rRNA sequence based method. Nineteen isolates of Mycobacteria were differentiated using hsp65 genes PRA. The dominant isolates were M. fortuitum (26.7%), M. chelonae like organism (13.3%) and M. mucogenicum (13.3%). Seventy one percent of NTM species were resistant to isoniazid, 64% to rifampin, 57% to ethambutol, 35% to tetracycline, 14 % to azithromycin and 7.1 % to amikacin.

conclusionThe results showed that E-test method is not a proper technique for antimycobacterial assay because some NTM species are slow in growing and have no growth on Muller Hinton agar. Regarding the 16S rRNA sequence analysis, the identification of isolates was restricted to the genus level, because 99% similarity within 16S rRNA of two isolates may or may not determine the same species.

Indexed as

16S rRNAAntibiotic resistance patternsE-testhsp65NTMWater samples

Identifiers

PMID23493797
PMCPMC3586926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.