Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23493635›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2013

Drosophila americana as a model species for comparative studies on the molecular basis of phenotypic variation.

Nuno A Fonseca, Ramiro Morales-Hojas, Micael Reis, Helder Rocha, Cristina P Vieira, Viola Nolte, Christian Schlötterer, Jorge Vieira

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Phylogeny of the GenusGenetics · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Helitrons shaping the genomic architecture of Drosophila: enrichment of DINE-TR1 in α- and β-heterochromatin, satellite DNA emergence, and piRNA expression.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2015
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nuno A FonsecaEMBL - European Bioinformatics Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Ramiro Morales-Hojas
Micael Reis
Helder Rocha
Cristina P Vieira
Viola Nolte
Christian Schlötterer
Jorge Vieira

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the molecular basis of within and between species phenotypic variation is one of the main goals of Biology. In Drosophila, most of the work regarding this issue has been performed in D. melanogaster, but other distantly related species must also be studied to verify the generality of the findings obtained for this species. Here, we make the case for D. americana, a species of the virilis group of Drosophila that has been diverging from the model species, D. melanogaster, for approximately 40 Myr. To determine the suitability of this species for such studies, polymorphism and recombination estimates are presented for D. americana based on the largest nucleotide sequence polymorphism data set so far analyzed (more than 100 data sets) for this species. The polymorphism estimates are also compared with those obtained from the comparison of the genome assembly of two D. americana strains (H5 and W11) here reported. As an example of the general utility of these resources, we perform a preliminary study on the molecular basis of lifespan differences in D. americana. First, we show that there are lifespan differences between D. americana populations from different regions of the distribution range. Then, we perform five F2 association experiments using markers for 21 candidate genes previously identified in D. melanogaster. Significant associations are found between polymorphism at two genes (hep and Lim3) and lifespan. For the F2 association study involving the two sequenced strains (H5 and W11), we identify amino acid differences at Lim3 and Hep that could be responsible for the observed changes in lifespan. For both genes, no large gene expression differences were observed between the two strains.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsBiological EvolutionDrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsGenome, InsectLife ExpectancyModels, GeneticMolecular Sequence DataPhenotypeSequence AlignmentDrosophila Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23493635
PMCPMC3641629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.