Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23489142›Full record

ReviewJournal of cognitive neuroscience2013

Is navigation in virtual reality with FMRI really navigation?

Jeffrey S Taube, Stephane Valerio, Ryan M Yoder

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Theta Activity Supports Landmark-Based Correction of Naturalistic Human Path Integration.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  14. A cognitive-motor framework for spatial navigation in aging and early-stage Alzheimer's disease.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Changes in spatial self-consciousness elicit grid cell-like representation in the entorhinal cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jeffrey S TaubeDartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Stephane Valerio
Ryan M Yoder

Funding

Neural Basis of Spatial CognitionR01NS053907 · NINDS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI TAUBE, JEFFREY STEVEN · 2005 to 2015
$3.2M
Motor, Vestibular, and Mnemonic Interactions in Directional Heading PerceptionsR01DC009318 · NIDCD · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI TAUBE, JEFFREY STEVEN · 2008 to 2011
$1.4M
Neural Basis for Spatial CognitionR56NS053907 · NINDS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI TAUBE, JEFFREY STEVEN · 2017 to 2017
$405k
NIDCD NIH HHS DC009318NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009318NINDS NIH HHS NS053907NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS053907NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS053907
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying the neural mechanisms underlying spatial orientation and navigation has long posed a challenge for researchers. Multiple approaches incorporating a variety of techniques and animal models have been used to address this issue. More recently, virtual navigation has become a popular tool for understanding navigational processes. Although combining this technique with functional imaging can provide important information on many aspects of spatial navigation, it is important to recognize some of the limitations these techniques have for gaining a complete understanding of the neural mechanisms of navigation. Foremost among these is that, when participants perform a virtual navigation task in a scanner, they are lying motionless in a supine position while viewing a video monitor. Here, we provide evidence that spatial orientation and navigation rely to a large extent on locomotion and its accompanying activation of motor, vestibular, and proprioceptive systems. Researchers should therefore consider the impact on the absence of these motion-based systems when interpreting virtual navigation/functional imaging experiments to achieve a more accurate understanding of the mechanisms underlying navigation.

Indexed as

Brain MappingOrientationUser-Computer InterfaceAnimalsBrainHumansNeural PathwaysNeuronsSpace Perception

Identifiers

PMID23489142
PMCPMC10271117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.