ArticleAnnals of human genetics2013
A comparison of the likelihood ratio test and the variance-stabilising transformation-based tests for detecting association of rare variants.
Article in Annals of human genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In a recent paper in this journal, the use of variance-stabilising transformation techniques was proposed to overcome the problem of inadequacy in normality approximation when testing association for a low-frequency variant in a case-control study. It was shown that tests based on the variance-stabilising transformations are more powerful than Fisher's exact test while controlling for type I error rate. Earlier in the journal, another study had shown that the likelihood ratio test (LRT) is superior to Fisher's exact test, Wald's test, and Pearson's χ(2) test in testing association for low-frequency variants. Thus, it is of interest to make a direct comparison between the LRT and the tests based on the variance-stabilising transformations. In this commentary, we show that the LRT and the variance-stabilising transformation-based tests have comparable power greater than Fisher's exact test, Wald's test, and Pearson's χ(2) test.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23488943What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.