Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23488545›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2013

Histamine-induced vasodilatation in the human forearm vasculature.

Euan A Sandilands, Jane Crowe, Hayley Cuthbert, Paul J Jenkins, Neil R Johnston, Michael Eddleston, D Nicholas Bateman, David J Webb

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Recombinant human diamine oxidase prevents histamine-induced hypoxia, shock and death in guinea pigs.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Histamine HPflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effect of histamine-receptor antagonism on leg blood flow during exercise.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Euan A SandilandsNPIS (Edinburgh), Scottish Poisons Information Bureau, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Jane Crowe
Hayley Cuthbert
Paul J Jenkins
Neil R Johnston
Michael Eddleston
D Nicholas Bateman
David J Webb
Edinburgh Royal Infirmary · GBThe Queen's Medical Research Institute · GBWellcome Trust · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office SCD/05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo investigate the mechanism of action of intra-arterial histamine in the human forearm vasculature.

methodsThree studies were conducted to assess changes in forearm blood flow (FBF) using venous occlusion plethysmography in response to intra-brachial histamine. First, the dose-response was investigated by assessing FBF throughout a dose-escalating histamine infusion. Next, histamine was infused at a constant dose to assess acute tolerance. Finally, a four way, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study was conducted to assess FBF response to histamine in the presence of H1 - and H2 -receptor antagonists. Flare and itch were assessed in all studies.

resultsHistamine caused a dose-dependent increase in FBF, greatest with the highest dose (30 nmol min(-1) ) infused [mean (SEM) infused arm vs. control: 26.8 (5.3) vs. 2.6 ml min(-1)  100 ml(-1) ; P < 0.0001]. Dose-dependent flare and itch were demonstrated. Acute tolerance was not observed, with an increased FBF persisting throughout the infusion period. H2 -receptor antagonism significantly reduced FBF (mean (95% CI) difference from placebo at 30 nmol min(-1) histamine: -11.9 ml min(-1)  100 ml(-1) (-4.0, -19.8), P < 0.0001) and flare (mean (95% CI) difference from placebo: -403.7 cm(2) (-231.4, 576.0), P < 0.0001). No reduction in FBF or flare was observed in response to the H1 -receptor antagonist. Itch was unaffected by the treatments. Histamine did not stimulate vascular release of tissue plasminogen activator or von Willebrand factor.

conclusionHistamine causes dose-dependent vasodilatation, flare and itch in the human forearm. H2 -receptors are important in this process. Our results support further exploration of combined H1 - and H2 -receptor antagonist therapy in acute allergic syndromes.

Indexed as

AdultCross-Over StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodForearmHistamineHistamine AgonistsHistamine AntagonistsHumansInfusions, Intra-ArterialMaleMiddle AgedPlethysmographyPruritusReceptors, Histamine H1Receptors, Histamine H2HistamineHistamine AgonistsHistamine AntagonistsReceptors, Histamine H1Receptors, Histamine H2forearm blood flowhistaminevasodilatationvenous occlusion plethysmography

Identifiers

PMID23488545
PMCPMC3853529
OpenAlexW1482750222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.