SynthesisClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2013
A meta-analysis of self-administered vs directly observed therapy effect on microbiologic failure, relapse, and acquired drug resistance in tuberculosis patients.
Synthesis in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04187469 (A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study for the Efficacy and Safety of the Substitution of Pyrazinamide and Ethambutol With Moxifloxacin During the Intensive Phase of Treatment of Pulmonary Tuberculosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 64 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study for the Efficacy and Safety of the Substitution of Pyrazinamide and Ethambutol With Moxifloxacin During the Intensive Phase of Treatment of Pulmonary Tuberculosis
Who cites it
64 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 123 citations in OpenAlex.
- A meta-analysis of technology-based interventions on treatment adherence and treatment success among TBC patients.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Patient adherence to tuberculosis treatment in the Indian subcontinent: systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research.BMJ open · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Effectiveness of interventions for reducing TB incidence in countries with low TB incidence: a systematic review of reviews.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2019Pooled it
- Adherence interventions and outcomes of tuberculosis treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials and observational studies.PLoS medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Official American Thoracic Society/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Infectious Diseases Society of America Clinical Practice Guidelines: Treatment of Drug-Susceptible Tuberculosis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016Guideline
- Impact of Community-Based DOT on Tuberculosis Treatment Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.PloS one · 2016Pooled it
- Directly observed therapy for treating tuberculosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Risk Factors for Acquired Rifamycin and Isoniazid Resistance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.PloS one · 2015Pooled it
- The impact of the stratification by degree of clinical severity and abandonment risk of tuberculosis treatment.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2021Trial
- Artificial intelligence-derived 3-Way Concentration-dependent Antagonism of Gatifloxacin, Pyrazinamide, and Rifampicin During Treatment of Pulmonary Tuberculosis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018Trial
- Trial
- Association between maintenance dialysis and tuberculosis treatment outcomes in Amazonas, Brazil: a population-based record-linkage cohort study (2001-2023) : Maintenance Dialysis and Tuberculosis Outcomes.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Integrated Artificial Intelligence Framework for Tuberculosis Treatment Abandonment Prediction: A Multi-Paradigm Approach.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Influences of radiographic silicosis and drug supervisor on the development of multi drug resistant-tuberculosis in West Java, Indonesia.Environmental health and preventive medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Investigating the efficacy of integrating video-directly observed therapy (VDOT) in the treatment of tuberculosis (TB): A statewide analysis from Florida.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2024Article
- Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024Review
- Omadacycline pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and efficacy against multidrug-resistantAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024Article
- Costs of Digital Adherence Technologies for Tuberculosis Treatment Support, 2018-2021.Emerging infectious diseases · 2024Article
4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPreclinical studies and Monte Carlo simulations have suggested that there is a relatively limited role of adherence in acquired drug resistance (ADR) and that very high levels of nonadherence are needed for therapy failure. We evaluated the superiority of directly observed therapy (DOT) for tuberculosis patients vs self-administered therapy (SAT) in decreasing ADR, microbiologic failure, and relapse in meta-analyses.
methodsProspective studies performed between 1965 and 2012 in which adult patients with microbiologically proven pulmonary Mycobacterium tuberculosis were separately assigned to either DOT or SAT as part of short-course chemotherapy were chosen. Endpoints were microbiologic failure, relapse, and ADR in patients on either DOT or SAT.
resultsTen studies, 5 randomized and 5 observational, met selection criteria: 8774 patients were allocated to DOT and 3708 were allocated to SAT. For DOT vs SAT, the pooled risk difference for microbiologic failure was .0 (95% confidence interval [CI], -.01 to .01), for relapse .01 (95% CI, -.03 to .06), and for ADR 0.0 (95% CI, -0.01 to 0.01). The incidence rates for DOT vs SAT were 1.5% (95% CI, 1.3%-1.8%) vs 1.7% (95% CI, 1.2%-2.2%) for microbiologic failure, 3.7% (95% CI, 0.7%-17.6%) vs 2.3% (95% CI, 0.7%-7.2%) for relapse, and 1.5% (95% CI, 0.2%-9.90%) vs 0.9% (95% CI, 0.4%-2.3%) for ADR, respectively. There was no evidence of publication bias.
conclusionsDOT was not significantly better than SAT in preventing microbiologic failure, relapse, or ADR, in evidence-based medicine. Resources should be shifted to identify other causes of poor microbiologic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.