Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23487387›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2013

Test-and-treat in Los Angeles: a mathematical model of the effects of test-and-treat for the population of men who have sex with men in Los Angeles County.

Neeraj Sood, Zachary Wagner, Amber Jaycocks, Emmanuel Drabo, Raffaele Vardavas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cost-effectiveness and budget effect of pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV-1 prevention in Germany from 2018 to 2058.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Increases in CD4Antiviral therapy · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A call to action for concentrated HIV epidemics.Current opinion in HIV and AIDS · 2014
    Article
  19. Review
  20. "Test-and-treat" strategy for control of HIV and AIDS can lead to a decrease, not an increase, of multidrug-resistant viruses.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Neeraj SoodSchaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Zachary Wagner
Amber Jaycocks
Emmanuel Drabo
Raffaele Vardavas

Funding

ECONOMICS OF TREATING VIRAL STIsR01HD054877 · NICHD · RAND CORPORATION · PI GOLDMAN, DANA P · 2009 to 2010
$985k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD054877NICHD NIH HHS R01HD054877
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is evidence to suggest that antiretroviral therapy (ART) and testing for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) reduce the probability of transmission of HIV. This has led health officials across the United States to take steps toward a test-and-treat policy. However, the extent of the benefits generated by test-and-treat is debatable, and there are concerns, such as increased multidrug resistance (MDR), that remain unaddressed.

methodsWe developed a deterministic epidemiologic model to simulate the HIV/AIDS epidemic for men who have sex with men (MSM) in Los Angeles County (LAC). We calibrated the model to match the HIV surveillance data from LAC across a 10-year period, starting in 2000. We then modified our model to simulate the test-and-treat policy and compared epidemiologic outcomes under the test-and-treat scenario to the status quo scenario over the years 2012-2023. Outcome measures included new infections, deaths, new AIDS cases, and MDR.

resultsRelative to the status quo, the test-and-treat model resulted in a 34% reduction in new infections, 19% reduction in deaths, and 39% reduction in new AIDS cases by 2023. However, these results are counterbalanced by a near doubling of the prevalence of MDR (9.06% compared to 4.79%) in 2023. We also found that the effects of increasing testing and treatment were not complementary.

conclusionsAlthough test-and-treat generates substantial benefits, it will not eliminate the epidemic for MSM in LAC. Moreover, these benefits are counterbalanced by large increases in MDR.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAnti-Retroviral AgentsDrug Resistance, ViralHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansLos AngelesMaleMass ScreeningPublic Health SurveillanceTreatment OutcomeAnti-Retroviral Agentsantiretroviral therapydrug resistanceHIV/AIDSmathematical modeltest and treat

Identifiers

PMID23487387
PMCPMC3658365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.