Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23486968›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2013

Antagonism of lidocaine inhibition by open-channel blockers that generate resurgent Na current.

Jason S Bant, Teresa K Aman, Indira M Raman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Effects of FGF14 and NaThe Journal of general physiology · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jason S BantInterdepartmental Biological Sciences Program, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA.
Teresa K Aman
Indira M Raman
Northwestern University · USMidwestern University · US

Funding

IONIC CURRENTS AND SPIKING IN CEREBELLAR NUCLEAR NEURONSR01NS039395 · NINDS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI RAMAN, INDIRA M · 2000 to 2012
$3.7M
Ionic currents and spiking in cerebellar nuclear neuronsR37NS039395 · NINDS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI RAMAN, INDIRA M · 2014 to 2019
$3.3M
The role of NaV2.4 in mediation of resurgent sodium currentF31NS065587 · NINDS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI BANT, JASON SAMUEL · 2009 to 2011
$109k
Resurgent Na current: regulation and reconstitution in cultured neuronsF31NS057866 · NINDS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI AMAN, TERESA K · 2007 to 2009
$80k
NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS057866NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS065587NINDS NIH HHS F31-NS57866NINDS NIH HHS F31-NS65587NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS039395NINDS NIH HHS R01-NS39395NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS039395
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Na channels that generate resurgent current express an intracellular endogenous open-channel blocking protein, whose rapid binding upon depolarization and unbinding upon repolarization minimizes fast and slow inactivation. Na channels also bind exogenous compounds, such as lidocaine, which functionally stabilize inactivation. Like the endogenous blocking protein, these use-dependent inhibitors bind most effectively at depolarized potentials, raising the question of how lidocaine-like compounds affect neurons with resurgent Na current. We therefore recorded lidocaine inhibition of voltage-clamped, tetrodotoxin-sensitive Na currents in mouse Purkinje neurons, which express a native blocking protein, and in mouse hippocampal CA3 pyramidal neurons with and without a peptide from the cytoplasmic tail of NaVβ4 (the β4 peptide), which mimics endogenous open-channel block. To control channel states during drug exposure, lidocaine was applied with rapid-solution exchange techniques during steps to specific voltages. Inhibition of Na currents by lidocaine was diminished by either the β4 peptide or the native blocking protein. In peptide-free CA3 cells, prolonging channel opening with a site-3 toxin, anemone toxin II, reduced lidocaine inhibition; this effect was largely occluded by open-channel blockers, suggesting that lidocaine binding is favored by inactivation but prevented by open-channel block. In constant 100 μm lidocaine, current-clamped Purkinje cells continued to fire spontaneously. Similarly, the β4 peptide reduced lidocaine-dependent suppression of spiking in CA3 neurons in slices. Thus, the open-channel blocking protein responsible for resurgent current acts as a natural antagonist of lidocaine. Neurons with resurgent current may therefore be less susceptible to use-dependent Na channel inhibitors used as local anesthetic, antiarrhythmic, and anticonvulsant drugs.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceAnimalsAnimals, NewbornBiophysical PhenomenaCA1 Region, HippocampalCnidarian VenomsElectric StimulationFemaleIn Vitro TechniquesIon Channel GatingLidocaineMaleMiceNeuronsPatch-Clamp TechniquesPeptidesCnidarian VenomsLidocainePeptidesScn4b protein, mouseSodium Channel BlockersSodium ChannelsTetrodotoxintoxin II (Anemonia sulcata)Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel beta-4 SubunitVoltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers

Identifiers

PMID23486968
PMCPMC3643213
OpenAlexW2020331446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.