ArticleJournal of human kinetics2012
Effect of various warm-up protocols on jump performance in college football players.
Article in Journal of human kinetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Concurrent Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of a Smartphone-Based Markerless System.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Reliability of the Output Sports Inertial Measurement Unit in Measuring a Reactive Strength Index from the Drop Jump and 10-5 Rebound Jump Test.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Associations Between Swimmers' Dry-Land Lower- and Upper-Limb Measures and Butterfly Sprint Performance.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Recovery After an Official Soccer Match: An Analysis of Markers of Muscle Damage and Oxidative Stress, and Endocrine, Neuromuscular and Perceptual Responses.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Article
- Comparison of the acute effects of static and dynamic stretching exercises on the balance performance of Turkish wrestlers.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Are counter movement jump and isometric mid-thigh pull tests reliable, valid, and sensitive measurement instruments when performed after maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing? A sex-based analysis in elite athletes.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- What We Do Not Know About Stretching in Healthy Athletes: A Scoping Review with Evidence Gap Map from 300 Trials.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Article
- A systematic review and net meta-analysis of the effects of different warm-up methods on the acute effects of lower limb explosive strength.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Article
- Day-to-day Variation of The Heart Rate, Heart Rate Variability, and Energy Expenditure During FIFA 11+ and Dynamic Warm-up Exercises.Journal of human kinetics · 2022Article
- Relationship of Performance Measures and Muscle Activity between a 180° Change of Direction Task and Different Countermovement Jumps.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Acute Effects of Dynamic Stretching on Muscle Flexibility and Performance: An Analysis of the Current Literature.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2018Review
- Measurement errors when estimating the vertical jump height with flight time using photocell devices: the example of Optojump.Biology of sport · 2017Article
- Acute effects of prolonged intermittent low-intensity isometric warm-up schemes on jump, sprint, and agility performance in collegiate soccer players.Biology of sport · 2015Article
- An Acute Bout of Self-Myofascial Release in the Form of Foam Rolling Improves Performance Testing.International journal of exercise scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to identify the effects of warm-up strategies on countermovement jump performance. Twenty-nine male college football players (age: 19.4 ± 1.1 years; body height: 179.0 ± 5.1 cm; body mass: 73.1 ± 8.0 kg; % body fat: 11.1 ± 2.7) from the Tuzla University underwent a control (no warm-up) and different warm-up conditions: 1. general warm-up; 2. general warm-up with dynamic stretching; 3. general warm-up, dynamic stretching and passive stretching; 4. passive static stretching; 5. passive static stretching and general warm-up; and, 6. passive static stretching, general warm-up and dynamic stretching. Countermovement jump performance was measured after each intervention or control. Results from one way repeated measures ANOVA revealed a significant difference on warm-up strategies at F (4.07, 113.86) = 69.56, p < 0.001, eta squared = 0.72. Bonferonni post hoc revealed that a general warm-up and a general warm-up with dynamic stretching posted the greatest gains among all interventions. On the other hand, no warm-up and passive static stretching displayed the least results in countermovement jump performance. In conclusion, countermovement jump performance preceded by a general warm-up or a general warm-up with dynamic stretching posted superior gains in countermovement jump performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.