Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23486282›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Molecular cell biology2013

Leveling Waddington: the emergence of direct programming and the loss of cell fate hierarchies.

Julia Ladewig, Philipp Koch, Oliver Brüstle

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed
18.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 221 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Direct in vivo reprogramming to relieve tissue ischemia via induced vasculogenesis.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Bioactive materials forBioactive materials · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The role of GATA2 in adult hematopoiesis and cell fate determination.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Oncogenic Viruses as Entropic Drivers of Cancer Evolution.Frontiers in virology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julia LadewigInstitute of Reconstructive Neurobiology, LIFE & BRAIN Center, University of Bonn, Sigmund Freud Straße 25, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Philipp Koch
Oliver Brüstle
University of Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For decades, Waddington's concept of the 'epigenetic landscape' has served as an educative hierarchical model to illustrate the progressive restriction of cell differentiation potential during normal development. While still being highly valuable in the context of normal development, the Waddington model falls short of accommodating recent breakthroughs in cell programming. The advent of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells and advances in direct cell fate conversion (also known as transdifferentiation) suggest that somatic and pluripotent cell fates can be interconverted without transiting through distinct hierarchies. We propose a non-hierarchical 'epigenetic disc' model to explain such cell fate transitions, which provides an alternative landscape for modelling cell programming and reprogramming.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineageCell TransdifferentiationCellular ReprogrammingHumansModels, GeneticPluripotent Stem Cells

Identifiers

PMID23486282
OpenAlexW2093047307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.