Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23486079›Full record

ArticleHeredity2014

Comparing G: multivariate analysis of genetic variation in multiple populations.

J D Aguirre, E Hine, K McGuigan, M W Blows

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Consequences of the cost of living: is variation in metabolic rate evolutionarily significant?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Variation in mutational (co)variances.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023
    Article
  9. Phenotypic stasis with genetic divergence.Peer community journal · 2023
    Article
  10. A method to predict the response to directional selection using a Kalman filter.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The genetic architecture of sexual dimorphism in the mossProceedings. Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J D AguirreSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
E Hine
K McGuigan
M W Blows

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The additive genetic variance-covariance matrix (G) summarizes the multivariate genetic relationships among a set of traits. The geometry of G describes the distribution of multivariate genetic variance, and generates genetic constraints that bias the direction of evolution. Determining if and how the multivariate genetic variance evolves has been limited by a number of analytical challenges in comparing G-matrices. Current methods for the comparison of G typically share several drawbacks: metrics that lack a direct relationship to evolutionary theory, the inability to be applied in conjunction with complex experimental designs, difficulties with determining statistical confidence in inferred differences and an inherently pair-wise focus. Here, we present a cohesive and general analytical framework for the comparative analysis of G that addresses these issues, and that incorporates and extends current methods with a strong geometrical basis. We describe the application of random skewers, common subspace analysis, the 4th-order genetic covariance tensor and the decomposition of the multivariate breeders equation, all within a Bayesian framework. We illustrate these methods using data from an artificial selection experiment on eight traits in Drosophila serrata, where a multi-generational pedigree was available to estimate G in each of six populations. One method, the tensor, elegantly captures all of the variation in genetic variance among populations, and allows the identification of the trait combinations that differ most in genetic variance. The tensor approach is likely to be the most generally applicable method to the comparison of G-matrices from any sampling or experimental design.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationModels, TheoreticalSelection, GeneticAnimalsBayes TheoremBiological EvolutionDrosophilaMarkov ChainsModels, GeneticMonte Carlo MethodMultivariate Analysis

Identifiers

PMID23486079
PMCPMC3860158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.