ArticleJournal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE2013
A community-based participatory research study of HIV and HPV vulnerabilities and prevention in two Pacific Islander communities: ethical challenges and solutions.
Article in Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Awareness of human papillomavirus infection among Indigenous males in North America and Oceania: a Scoping Review.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2024Article
- Ground-up approach to understanding the impacts of historical trauma in one reserve-dwelling first nations community.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology · 2023Article
- Using community engagement to implement evidence-based practices for opioid use disorder: A data-driven paradigm & systems science approach.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2021Article
- Beyond the Belmont Principles: A Community-Based Approach to Developing an Indigenous Ethics Model and Curriculum for Training Health Researchers Working with American Indian and Alaska Native Communities.American journal of community psychology · 2019Article
- Best Practices for Community-Engaged Research with Pacific Islander Communities in the US and USAPI: A Scoping Review.Journal of health care for the poor and underserved · 2019Article
- Racial Pride and Condom Use in Post-Incarcerated African-American Men Who Have Sex With Men and Women: Test of a Conceptual Model for the Men in Life Environments Intervention.Archives of sexual behavior · 2018Article
- Community-Based Participatory Research Studies on HIV/AIDS Prevention, 2005-2014.Jacobs journal of community medicine · 2016Article
- Ethical Considerations of Community-based Participatory Research: Contextual Underpinnings for Developing Countries.International journal of preventive medicine · 2014Article
- Contextualization of HIV and HPV risk and prevention among Pacific Islander young adults in Southern California.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We describe ethical issues that emerged during a one-year CBPR study of HIV and human papillomavirus (HPV) vulnerabilities and prevention in two Pacific Islander (PI) communities, and the collaborative solutions to these challenges reached by academic and community partners. In our project case study analysis, we found that ethical tensions were linked mainly to issues of mutual trust and credibility in PI communities; cultural taboos associated with the nexus of religiosity and traditional PI culture; fears of privacy breaches in small, interconnected PI communities; and competing priorities of scientific rigor versus direct community services. Mutual capacity building and linking CBPR practice to PI social protocols are required for effective solutions and progress toward social justice outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.