Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23485427›Full record

ArticleVision research2013

Effects of prematurity on the development of contrast sensitivity: testing the visual experience hypothesis.

Rain G Bosworth, Karen R Dobkins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vision research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Color and newborn intensive care unit design: executive summary.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rain G BosworthDepartment of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0109, USA. rbosworth@ucsd.edu
Karen R Dobkins
University of California San Diego · US

Funding

Effects of Biological Maturation and Visual Experience on Human Visual DevelopmenR01EY019035 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BOSWORTH, RAIN G, DOBKINS, KAREN R · 2008 to 2012
$1.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019035NEI NIH HHS R01-EY19035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to investigate the effects of visual experience on early visual development, the current study compared contrast sensitivity across infants born with different degrees of moderate-to-late prematurity. Here the logic is that at any given postterm age, the most premature infants will have the oldest postnatal age. Given that postnatal age is a proxy for visual experience, the visual experience hypothesis predicts that infants who are more premature, yet healthy, should have higher sensitivity. Luminance (light/dark) and chromatic (red/green) contrast sensitivities (CS) were measured in 236 healthy infants (born -10 to +2 weeks relative to due date) between 5 and 32 weeks postterm age from due date and 8-38 weeks postnatal from birth date. For chromatic CS, we found clear evidence that infants who were most premature within our sample had the highest sensitivity. Specifically, 4-10 additional weeks of visual experience, by virtue of being born early, enhanced chromatic CS. For luminance CS, similar but weaker results were seen. Here, only infants with an additional 6-10 weeks of visual experience, and only at later age points in development, showed enhanced sensitivity. However, CS in preterm infants was still below that of fullterm infants with equivalent postnatal age. In sum, these results suggest that chromatic CS is influenced more by prematurity (and possibly visual experience) than luminance CS, which has implications for differential development of parvocellular and magnocellular pathways.

Indexed as

Child, PreschoolContrast SensitivityFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMalePhotic StimulationPremature BirthRegression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID23485427
PMCPMC3684210
OpenAlexW2154828833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.