Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23483331›Full record

ArticleChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2013

Congenital idiopathic hydrocephalus of infancy: the results of treatment by endoscopic third ventriculostomy with or without choroid plexus cauterization and suggestions for how it works.

Benjamin C Warf

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic third ventriculostomy and choroid plexus cauterization for infantile hydrocephalus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Understanding barriers to pediatric hydrocephalus management: an international survey.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in children with chronic communicating congenital hydrocephalus: a single-center cohort retrospective analysis.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy and choroid plexus cauterization (ETV/CPC) for hydrocephalus of infancy: a technical review.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2021
    Article
  18. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy and cerebrospinal fluid shunting for pure communicating hydrocephalus in children.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Hydrocephalus and mucopolysaccharidoses: what do we know and what do we not know?Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benjamin C WarfDepartments of Neurosurgery and Global Health and Social Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA. benjamin.warf@childrens.harvard.edu
Harvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe traditional bulk flow model of communicating hydrocephalus does not support treatment by endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV), but successful treatment is reported in adults. This study is the first to report long-term success of ETV +/- choroid plexus cauterization (CPC) for infants with congenital idiopathic hydrocephalus (CIH). The results are interpreted in the context of current models for hydrocephalus.

methodsThe CURE Children's Hospital of Uganda prospective database was reviewed for the years 2001-2006 to identify children <24 months of age meeting the criteria for CIH who underwent ETV with or without bilateral CPC. Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess treatment success survival. Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxin and logrank tests were used to determine significance of survival differences. Fisher's exact test was used to determine the significance of differences between groups.

resultsSixty-four infants (mean/median age, 6.1/5.0 months) met the inclusion criteria. Sixteen consecutive patients were treated by ETV alone, and the subsequent 48 by ETV/CPC (mean/median follow-up 34.4/36.0 months). ETV was successful in 20 % and ETV/CPC in 72.4 % at 4 years (p < 0.0002, logrank test; p = 0.0006, Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxin; hazard ratio 6.9, 95 % CI 2.5-19.3).

conclusionsETV/CPC was significantly more successful than ETV alone in treating CIH. The primary effect of ETV, as a pulsation absorber, and of CPC, as a pulsation reducer, may be to abate the net force of intraventricular pulsations that produce ventricular expansion. ETV alone may be less successful for infants because of greater brain compliance. ETV/CPC should be considered an effective primary treatment option.

Indexed as

CauteryChoroid PlexusEndoscopyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHydrocephalusInfantMaleRetrospective StudiesSurvival AnalysisThird VentricleTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeVentriculostomy

Identifiers

PMID23483331
OpenAlexW2049885333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.