Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23483310›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2013

Neurological impairment score in lumbar spinal stenosis.

B Micankova Adamova, S Vohanka, M Hnojcikova, I Okacova, L Dusek, J Bednarik

Open access · bronzeAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Outcomes and their predictors in lumbar spinal stenosis: a 12-year follow-up.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2015
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

B Micankova AdamovaDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital and Masaryk University Brno, Jihlavska 20, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic. badamova@fnbrno.cz
S Vohanka
M Hnojcikova
I Okacova
L Dusek
J Bednarik
Central European Institute of Technology · CZMasaryk University · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimThe Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is an interview-based instrument generally accepted as a measure of disability in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). There is, however, no generally accepted measure for neurological impairment in LSS. We therefore developed a scoring system [neurological impairment score in lumbar spinal stenosis (NIS-LSS)] for the assessment of neurological impairment in the lower limbs of patients with LSS, then performed a validation study to facilitate its implementation in the routine clinical evaluation of patients with LSS.

methodsThe NIS-LSS is based on the combined evaluation of tendon reflexes, tactile and vibratory sensation, pareses, and the ability to walk and run; the total score ranges from 0 (inability to walk) to 33 points (no impairment). A group of 117 patients with LSS and a control group of 63 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers were assessed with the NIS-LSS to evaluate capacity to discriminate between LSS patients and controls. A correlation with the ODI was performed for assessment of construct validity.

resultsThe median NIS-LSS was 27 points in LSS patients compared with 33 points in controls. The NIS-LSS discriminated LSS patients from healthy controls to a high degree of significance: the optimum NIS-LSS cut-off value was 32 points with a sensitivity of 85.5% and a specificity of 81.3% (p < 0.001). Overall NIS-LSS correlated significantly with the ODI score (p < 0.001). Vibratory sensation (p = 0.04), presence of paresis (p = 0.01) and especially the ability to walk and run (p < 0.001) were the NIS-LSS elements that correlated most closely with the degree of disability assessed by the ODI.

conclusionsThe NIS-LSS is a simple and valid measure of neurological impairment in the lower limbs of patients with LSS (without comorbidity), discriminating them from healthy controls to a high degree of sensitivity and specificity and correlating closely with the degree of disability. It extends our ability to quantify neurological status and to follow changes arising out of the natural course of the disease or the effects of treatment.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationLumbar VertebraeAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesDiagnostic Techniques, NeurologicalFemaleHumansLower ExtremityMaleMiddle AgedNervous System DiseasesReflex, StretchSensitivity and SpecificitySpinal StenosisTouch

Identifiers

PMID23483310
PMCPMC3731473
OpenAlexW2039447621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.