ArticleHerz2013
H-FABP, cardiovascular risk factors, and functional status in asymptomatic spinal cord injury patients.
Article in Herz, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endocrinological and inflammatory markers in individuals with spinal cord injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2022Pooled it
- Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Cardiometabolic Risk in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury/Disease: A Scoping Review.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2025Review
- Potential clinical biomarkers and perspectives in diabetic cardiomyopathy.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2023Review
- Body Composition According to Spinal Cord Injury Level: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Coronary artery disease presenting with left upper quadrant pain in a patient with chronic cervical tetraplegia.Spinal cord series and cases · 2017Article
- eIF5A1/RhoGDIα pathway: a novel therapeutic target for treatment of spinal cord injury identified by a proteomics approach.Scientific reports · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis was a cross-sectional study in the setting of a rehabilitation hospital.
objectiveThe aim of the study was to determine the serum levels of heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP) in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). A further goal was to examine whether there is a relationship between H-FABP levels and Functional Ambulation Classification (FAC) scale, Functional Independence Measure (FIM) score, American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) status, and metabolic syndrome (MetS).
methodsThe study included 56 SCI patients and 37 age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects who had not been diagnosed with coronary artery disease in the past.
resultsSerum H-FABP levels were significantly higher in patients with SCI than in control subjects: paraplegia group, 18.5 ± 11.4; tetraplegia group, 16.3 ± 9.1; control group, 6.7 ± 5.1 ng/ml (p < 0.001). There was no difference between the other cardiac enzymes (troponin I, AST, ALT, CK, CK-MB, and LDH) among the groups. The relationship between the serum H-FABP levels and FAC status was examined. There was a negative correlation between FAC status and H-FABP levels (p < 0.001, r = - 0.581). Patients with complete SCI were divided into two groups according to the level of the lesion: (lesion levels in C6-T6, n = 25; lesion levels in T7-L2, n = 11). In patients with complete motor injury, H-FABP levels were higher in subjects with injuries above T6 than in those with injuries below T6 (24.21 ± 10.1 and 14.1 ± 10.4, respectively; p = 0.011). Serum levels of H-FABP were higher in SCI patients with MetS (n = 10) than in those without MetS (n = 46; 25.8 ± 11.6 ng/ml vs. 16.42 ± 10.3 ng/ml, respectively; p = 0.014). Patients were then divided into two groups according to SCI duration: < 12 months (n = 27) and > 12 months (n = 29). H-FABP levels showed statistically significant differences between the two groups (14.8 ± 11.7 ng/dl and 20.9 ± 9.9 ng/dl, respectively; p = 0.036).
conclusionH-FABP is related to MetS and FAC status in asymptomatic SCI patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.