Combined antiplatelet and novel oral anticoagulant therapy after acute coronary syndrome: is three a crowd?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Practical Guide to Direct New Oral Anticoagulant Use for Secondary Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2016
   Article
2. Neuraxial and peripheral nerve blocks in patients taking anticoagulant or thromboprophylactic drugs: challenges and solutions.Local and regional anesthesia · 2015
   Review
3. The "dual-pathway" strategy after acute coronary syndrome: rivaroxaban and antiplatelet agents in the ATLAS ACS 2-TIMI 51 trial.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2014
   Review
4. New oral anticoagulants in acute coronary syndrome: is there any advantage over existing treatments?International cardiovascular research journal · 2014
   Article
5. Optimal oral antithrombotic regimes for patients with acute coronary syndrome: a network meta-analysis.PloS one · 2014
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  New oral anticoagulants in addition to single or dual antiplatelet therapy after an acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.2013

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as