ArticleInteractive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2013
A novel two-hit rodent model of postoperative acute lung injury: priming the immune system leads to an exaggerated injury after pneumonectomy.
Article in Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sleeve lobectomy compared with pneumonectomy for operable centrally located non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.Translational lung cancer research · 2019Article
- Potential effects of medicinal plants and secondary metabolites on acute lung injury.BioMed research international · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesPostoperative acute lung injury (PALI) is a rare, poorly understood, usually fatal condition, accounting for the majority of deaths following lung resection. Its low frequency and unpredictable development make the identification of the mechanisms of injury from clinical studies alone almost impossible. Multiple validated 'two-hit models' exist for ALI secondary to other causes. We describe a novel rodent 'two-hit' model of PALI: a low-grade immune stimulus, such as sepsis, greatly aggravates the injury in the remaining lung observed following pneumonectomy.
methodsUnder general anaesthesia, rats received either low-dose intratracheal lipopolysaccharide (IT-LPS) challenge (10 μg for 1 h) followed by left posterolateral thoracotomy, one-lung ventilation (OLV), pneumonectomy and 3 h of ventilation; 500 μl IT 0.9% saline followed by the same surgery or IT-LPS followed by sham surgery and ventilation. All other conditions were constant. Lung injury is heralded by neutrophil accumulation, which was determined by right lung bronchoalveolar lavage cell count. Data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. The T-test was used to compare normally distributed groups with correction for multiple comparisons.
resultsA dose-response curve identified the clinically relevant 'low dose' of LPS to be used in further studies. Ventilatory parameters were standardized to reflect clinical practice (volume-control, tidal volume of 6 ml/kg, positive end-expiratory pressure of 2 cmH2O, maximum airway pressure of <15 cmH2O). There was a degree of adaptation to obtain a consistent and robust model with retest validity. OLV and pneumonectomy alone produced a small lung injury (65.1 ± 5), as did 10 µg intratracheal LPS alone (50.7 ± 6.9). However, when OLV, pneumonectomy and 10 µg LPS were combined, an exaggerated injury occurred (161.4 ± 10.3), P = 0.007.
conclusionsEarly results show that a two-hit model of PALI is viable and that sepsis aggravates the response to pneumonectomy. The model is now being further characterized. Once established, this model will offer the chance to better understand PALI and to develop and test novel therapies and risk reduction strategies for the condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.