Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23481592›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2013

Antimicrobial resistance in Enterococcus spp. isolated from environmental samples in an area of intensive poultry production.

Vesna Furtula, Charlene R Jackson, Erin Gwenn Farrell, John B Barrett, Lari M Hiott, Patricia A Chambers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Occurrence of Antimicrobial-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  10. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance patterns ofJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2022
    Article
  11. Biology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Antimicrobial Resistance inFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Vesna FurtulaEnvironment Canada, Pacific Environment Science Centre, 2645 Dollarton Highway, North Vancouver, BC V7H 1B1, Canada. vesna.furtula@ec.gc.ca
Charlene R Jackson
Erin Gwenn Farrell
John B Barrett
Lari M Hiott
Patricia A Chambers
Agricultural Research Service · USEnvironment and Climate Change Canada · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enterococcus spp. from two poultry farms and proximate surface and ground water sites in an area of intensive poultry production were tested for resistance to 16 clinical antibiotics. Resistance patterns were compared to assess trends and possible correlations for specific antimicrobials and levels of resistance. Enterococci were detected at all 12 surface water sites and three of 28 ground water sites. Resistance to lincomycin, tetracycline, penicillin and ciprofloxacin in poultry litter isolates was high (80.3%, 65.3%, 61.1% and 49.6%, respectively). Resistance in the surface water to the same antibiotics was 87.1%, 24.1%, 7.6% and 12.9%, respectively. Overall, 86% of litter isolates, 58% of surface water isolates and 100% of ground water isolates were resistant to more than one antibiotic. Fifty-four different resistance patterns were recognised in isolates obtained from litter and environmental samples and several E. faecium and E. faecalis isolates from litter and environment samples shared the same resistance pattern. Multiple antibiotic resistant (MAR) indices calculated to assess health risks due to the presence of resistant enterococci suggested an increased presence of antibiotics in surface water, likely from poultry sources as no other wastewater contributions in the area were documented.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialPoultryAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsEnterococcusEnvironmental MonitoringMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSoil PollutantsWater PollutantsAnti-Bacterial AgentsSoil PollutantsWater Pollutants

Identifiers

PMID23481592
PMCPMC3709301
OpenAlexW2052769101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.